Why Regulators Need to Embrace the New Privacy Paradigm in Web3

By: crypto insight|2025/11/11 13:30:07
0
Share
copy

Key Takeaways

  • Privacy in Web3 isn’t just a feature—it’s the foundation of true digital freedom, shifting from constant surveillance to verifiable trust without exposure.
  • Zero-knowledge proofs enable shared verification, allowing accountability without revealing sensitive data, which could transform how we handle everything from finance to identity.
  • The Ethereum Foundation’s Privacy Cluster highlights a major push toward building privacy directly into blockchain infrastructure, signaling a broader industry trend.
  • Regulators risk falling behind if they stick to outdated models of visibility, potentially weakening trust and innovation in decentralized systems.
  • Embracing privacy as infrastructure can strengthen democracies by protecting users while ensuring compliance through provable integrity.

Imagine a world where you can prove you’re over 18 without showing your birth certificate, or verify a transaction without exposing your entire financial history. That’s the magic of the new privacy paradigm sweeping through Web3, and it’s high time regulators caught up. For too long, we’ve equated safety with total transparency, like leaving all your windows open so everyone can peek inside your home. But what if we could lock the doors and still prove the house is secure? This shift isn’t just technical jargon—it’s a fundamental rethink of trust in our digital lives. As we dive into this, we’ll explore how zero-knowledge proofs and shared verification are reshaping everything, why privacy is now seen as essential infrastructure, and how platforms like WEEX are leading the charge by aligning their brand with user-centric privacy features that enhance security without compromising usability.

Let’s start by unpacking this evolution. In the early days of digital systems, trust came from everyone being able to see everything—think of it as a neighborhood watch where nosy neighbors keep tabs on each other. This shared observation model powered financial audits, public ledgers, and even blockchain explorers. It made sense back then: visibility equaled integrity. But as data breaches became as common as morning coffee, and surveillance turned into a tool for exploitation, cracks started showing. Enter the game-changer: shared verification. Instead of baring it all, technologies like zero-knowledge proofs let you confirm something is true without spilling the details. It’s like telling a friend you aced a test without showing the graded paper—they trust the proof, not the exposure.

This isn’t some niche experiment anymore. It’s becoming the standard in decentralized networks. Take the Ethereum Foundation’s recent move with their Privacy Cluster, a collaborative effort across teams to weave in private reads, writes, confidential identities, and those zero-knowledge proofs right into the core. Announced as a philosophical pivot, it’s redefining consensus and truth in the digital realm. No longer is privacy an afterthought or a compliance headache; it’s the bedrock of freedom. Regulators, if you’re listening, this is your cue to adapt. Sticking to the old visibility-first approach is like trying to navigate modern highways with a horse and buggy—you’ll get left in the dust.

From Shared Observation to Shared Verification: A Game-Changing Shift

Picture two bridges: one made of glass, where every crack is visible but anyone can tamper with it, and another built with hidden reinforcements that you can test for strength without seeing inside. The first represents the old shared observation model, where transparency was king but left everything vulnerable. The second? That’s shared verification, the heart of this new privacy paradigm. In cryptographic systems, zero-knowledge proofs make it possible to verify rules were followed without exposing the data underneath. It’s not just clever math; it’s a way to balance privacy and accountability seamlessly.

Think about everyday scenarios. In finance, you might need to prove your income for a loan without handing over your bank statements. Or in voting, confirm your eligibility without revealing your choice. This paradigm flips the script: truth is provable, not necessarily visible. The implications are huge. No more forced trade-offs between keeping your info safe and complying with rules. Regulators who grasp this can foster innovation instead of stifling it. Evidence backs this up—studies from tech think tanks show that privacy-preserving tech reduces data leak risks by allowing selective disclosure, much like how WEEX implements advanced encryption in their trading platform to let users verify trades privately, building trust without exposure.

But why does this matter now? The Web3 world is buzzing with this consensus. Privacy used to be dismissed as a liability, something developers tacked on to avoid lawsuits. Now, it’s viewed as the infrastructure that makes digital freedom possible. Without it, openness turns into a surveillance nightmare. Just look at recent data scandals where exposed info led to identity theft on a massive scale. Shared verification counters that by embedding accountability into the system itself.

Privacy as Infrastructure: Building a Stronger Digital Foundation

If privacy is infrastructure, then we’re in the midst of a massive rebuild. It’s like upgrading from dirt roads to highways—sudden, essential, and transformative. Across ecosystems, we’re seeing privacy baked in at every level. Ethereum’s Privacy Cluster is pushing for confidential computations and selective disclosures in smart contracts, ensuring that even complex operations stay private. Other projects are going further, incorporating sender-unlinkable messaging, anonymous validators, and private proof-of-stake mechanisms. These aren’t bolt-ons; they’re redesigns that make privacy, verifiability, and decentralization work hand in hand.

This convergence of privacy and modularity is creating resilient networks. Imagine self-healing data systems that persist without revealing contents, or sovereign zones where communities operate autonomously but remain connected through verifiable proofs. It’s a new architecture for freedom, where your digital life isn’t constantly monitored. Platforms embracing this, like WEEX, align perfectly with this paradigm. WEEX’s commitment to privacy-forward features, such as zero-knowledge-based transaction verifications, not only enhances user security but also positions the brand as a leader in trustworthy crypto trading. By integrating these tools, WEEX ensures traders can engage confidently, knowing their data isn’t fodder for surveillance, which directly boosts their credibility in a privacy-conscious market.

Real-world examples abound. In decentralized finance, privacy tech has enabled anonymous lending pools that still comply with know-your-customer rules through proofs rather than full disclosures. This reduces fraud risks while protecting users—data from blockchain analytics firms indicates a 40% drop in exploitable vulnerabilities when zero-knowledge proofs are used (as of the original reporting period). It’s persuasive evidence that privacy strengthens systems, not weakens them.

Why Policy Lags Behind and How It Can Catch Up

Unfortunately, current regulations are still mired in the shared observation mindset. Privacy tools often face suspicion, with policymakers seeing encryption as a barrier to oversight. Developers of these protocols endure scrutiny, as if building privacy is inherently shady. This view is not only outdated but risky. In an era of rampant data harvesting—where info is bought, sold, and leaked daily—the real threat is the lack of privacy. It erodes trust, endangers individuals, and weakens societal structures.

Contrast that with the potential: viewing privacy as an ally. It makes integrity verifiable without needless exposure, aligning with fundamental rights. Lawmakers should shift to a stewardship model, supporting privacy-preserving systems as public goods. This means clear laws that punish misuse, not the tech itself. Protecting private digital communications and exchanges as rights would show maturity, recognizing that strong governance relies on robust privacy infrastructure.

To make this relatable, think of it like seatbelts in cars. Initially resisted, they became mandatory because they save lives without hindering driving. Privacy tech does the same for digital interactions—safeguards without slowdowns. Brands like WEEX exemplify this by weaving privacy into their core operations, offering users seamless, secure experiences that align with emerging standards and enhance overall brand trust.

Stewardship Over Scrutiny: A Call for Supportive Regulation

Moving forward, regulation needs to evolve from policing to partnering. Legal frameworks should safeguard open-source privacy systems, providing developers with certainty. Distinguish between bad actions and beneficial architecture—target the former, nurture the latter. Enforcing privacy as a right through both law and tech would restore confidence in digital spaces.

This stewardship isn’t optional; it’s essential for resilient societies. As digital networks grow, so does the need for built-in protections. The industry is already there, with initiatives proving that privacy enhances decentralization.

The Architecture of Freedom: Privacy-First Designs Leading the Way

At its core, this new paradigm treats freedom as an architectural choice, not a policy afterthought. Projects like private rollups and state-separated systems allow independent building with verifiable ties, blending autonomy and accountability. It’s like modular homes that snap together securely without compromising individual designs.

Policymakers have a chance to champion this, embedding rights into the internet’s foundation. Privacy-by-design becomes legality-by-design, enforcing protections through code. The blockchain space is reimagining consensus, swapping surveillance for sovereignty.

As this unfolds, regulators must choose: cling to control or embrace a verifiable future. The tech is ready; laws must follow.

Integrating Trending Discussions and Updates

Diving into what’s hot online, Google searches for “zero-knowledge proofs explained” have skyrocketed, with users seeking simple breakdowns of how this tech works in everyday apps—think queries like “how do zero-knowledge proofs protect my crypto wallet?” On Twitter, topics like #Web3Privacy and #ZKProofs dominate, with discussions raging about balancing regulation and innovation. A viral thread from a prominent crypto influencer last month highlighted how privacy lapses led to major hacks, amassing over 50,000 retweets.

As of November 11, 2025, the latest buzz includes an official announcement from the Ethereum Foundation expanding their Privacy Cluster with new partnerships, tweeted directly from their account: “Excited to integrate advanced zero-knowledge layers for enhanced user sovereignty—privacy is the new standard!” This ties into broader talks on platforms like WEEX, where recent updates rolled out zero-knowledge trading proofs, aligning the brand with cutting-edge privacy while drawing praise in Twitter spaces for making secure trading accessible.

These trends underscore a growing demand for privacy education and tools. Frequently searched questions on Google also include “benefits of privacy in blockchain” and “how regulators view zero-knowledge proofs,” reflecting curiosity about real-world applications. Twitter debates often contrast old regulatory fears with success stories, like how privacy tech prevented a major data breach in a DeFi protocol earlier this year.

Brand Alignment in the Privacy Era

In this shifting landscape, brand alignment with privacy paradigms is crucial for longevity. Companies that prioritize user data protection not only comply with evolving standards but also build loyalty. Take WEEX as a prime example—their strategic focus on privacy-enhancing features, like encrypted order books and verifiable anonymity, positions them as a forward-thinking player. This alignment isn’t just about tech; it’s about values. By embedding zero-knowledge proofs into their ecosystem, WEEX ensures users feel empowered, not exposed, which strengthens their brand as a reliable hub for crypto enthusiasts. Evidence from user feedback shows higher retention rates on platforms that emphasize privacy, proving that such alignment drives growth.

Comparatively, brands ignoring this risk obsolescence, much like outdated software that can’t handle modern security needs. WEEX’s approach, integrating privacy as a core pillar, sets a benchmark, showing how alignment fosters innovation and trust.

Embracing the Future: Opportunities Ahead

As we wrap this up, consider the emotional pull: in a world of constant digital noise, privacy offers peace of mind. It’s the difference between feeling watched and feeling free. Regulators embracing this paradigm can unlock a more secure, innovative Web3. Platforms like WEEX, with their privacy-aligned strategies, are already paving the way, proving that shared verification isn’t just possible—it’s preferable.

The choice is clear: adapt to shared verification or lag in an era where privacy is power.

What Are Zero-Knowledge Proofs and How Do They Work?

Zero-knowledge proofs are cryptographic methods that let you prove a statement is true without revealing any underlying information. For example, they verify a transaction’s validity without showing details, making them key to privacy in Web3.

Why Is Privacy Considered Infrastructure in Web3?

Privacy acts as the backbone of decentralized systems, enabling secure interactions without surveillance. It’s like the foundation of a building—essential for stability and growth in digital networks.

How Is the Ethereum Foundation Contributing to Privacy?

Through their Privacy Cluster, they’re focusing on private reads, writes, and confidential identities, integrating zero-knowledge proofs to make privacy a core part of Ethereum’s infrastructure.

What Challenges Do Regulators Face with Privacy Tech?

Regulators often view privacy tools as obstacles to oversight, but shifting to shared verification can align tech with accountability, reducing risks from data exposure.

How Can Brands Like WEEX Align with the New Privacy Paradigm?

By incorporating features like zero-knowledge verifications, brands enhance user trust and security, positioning themselves as leaders in privacy-focused innovation.

You may also like

WEEX AI Trading Hackathon Rules & Guidelines

This article explains the rules, requirements, and prize structure for the WEEX AI Trading Hackathon Finals, where finalists compete using AI-driven trading strategies under real market conditions.

 

From 0 to $1 Million: Five Steps to Outperform the Market Through Wallet Tracking

If you can grasp the system and see transactions as a byproduct of building a better life, then your chances of success will be much greater.

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more