UNI Token Skyrockets 38% Following Innovative Fee Switch and Burn Proposals – A Game-Changer for Decentralized Exchanges

By: crypto insight|2025/11/11 14:00:07
0
Share
copy

Key Takeaways

  • UNI token rallied over 38% to $9.70, boosting its market cap beyond $6 billion, driven by proposals for a protocol fee switch and token burning mechanism.
  • The “UNIfication” proposal includes burning 100 million UNI tokens—about 16% of circulating supply—and introducing fee discounts to enhance investor appeal and liquidity.
  • Fees from Uniswap’s Ethereum layer-2 network, Unichain, which has annualized $7.5 million since launching nine months ago, will feed into the UNI burn system.
  • Uniswap continues prioritizing protocol development with a new Growth Budget distributing 20 million UNI tokens to support DeFi builders and ecosystem growth.
  • This move positions Uniswap as a leading decentralized exchange for tokenized value, with cumulative volume nearing $4 trillion since its 2018 launch.

Imagine waking up to news that your favorite cryptocurrency has suddenly jumped in value, not because of some fleeting market hype, but due to real, tangible changes that could reshape its future. That’s exactly what happened with the UNI token, the governance powerhouse behind Uniswap, one of the most prominent decentralized exchanges out there. If you’ve been tracking the crypto space, you know how volatile things can be—like riding a rollercoaster blindfolded. But this surge feels different, grounded in proposals that promise to make holding UNI more rewarding than ever. Let’s dive into what sparked this 38% rally and why it might just be the start of something bigger, especially when you consider platforms like WEEX that align perfectly with innovative DeFi ecosystems by offering secure, user-friendly trading environments.

Picture UNI as the quiet underdog in a race dominated by giants like Bitcoin and Solana. While those heavyweights have been stealing the spotlight this cycle, UNI has been trailing behind, waiting for its moment. That moment arrived when the Uniswap Foundation teamed up with Uniswap Labs to unveil a set of game-changing ideas. At the heart of it all is the “UNIfication” proposal, a blueprint designed to supercharge the appeal of UNI for investors. It’s like giving an old car a turbo engine—suddenly, it’s not just reliable; it’s exhilarating.

The proposal kicks off with activating a protocol-level fee mechanism that burns UNI tokens. Burning tokens is a bit like pruning a tree to make it stronger; you remove excess supply to boost the value of what’s left. This isn’t just talk—it’s backed by concrete plans. For instance, they’re eyeing a burn of 100 million UNI straight from the treasury, which represents roughly 16% of the token’s circulating supply. That’s a massive chunk, and it could dramatically shift the supply-demand balance in favor of holders. Think about it: fewer tokens chasing the same demand often means higher prices, a strategy we’ve seen work wonders in other projects. Evidence from similar burns in the crypto world, like those in Ethereum’s ecosystem, shows how reducing supply can lead to sustained value growth, provided demand holds steady.

But that’s not all. The proposal introduces a Protocol Fee Discount Auctions system, aimed at ramping up returns for liquidity providers. If you’re someone who stakes tokens to keep the exchange humming, this could mean better incentives, making Uniswap even more attractive. It’s a smart way to reward the community that powers the platform, much like how a successful business shares profits with its loyal employees to foster long-term growth. And speaking of fees, let’s talk about Unichain, Uniswap’s Ethereum layer-2 solution. Since its launch nine months ago, it’s already generating an annualized $7.5 million in fees. Under the new plan, those fees will funnel directly into the UNI burn mechanism, creating a self-sustaining cycle that burns tokens and potentially drives up value. It’s a clever loop, reminiscent of how subscription models in tech companies like Netflix reinvest earnings to improve content and retain users.

This rally pushed UNI to $9.70, a 38.5% jump that propelled its market cap past the $6 billion mark, landing it as the 34th largest cryptocurrency. To put that in perspective, Uniswap has processed around $4 trillion in cumulative volume since kicking off in November 2018. That’s not pocket change—it’s a testament to its dominance as the go-to decentralized exchange (DEX). Compared to centralized platforms, Uniswap offers that pure, trustless trading experience, but with these proposals, it’s evolving to compete even more fiercely. Platforms like WEEX, known for their robust security features and seamless integration with DeFi protocols, complement this by providing traders with tools to capitalize on such rallies without the headaches of traditional exchanges. WEEX’s commitment to user education and low-fee trading aligns beautifully with Uniswap’s vision, making it easier for everyday investors to jump in and benefit.

Now, you might be wondering, what’s the bigger picture here? The Uniswap Foundation calls this the “next era” for the protocol, but they’re not abandoning their roots. Issuing grants to boost protocol development and support DeFi builders remains a top priority. To fuel this, they’re rolling out a Growth Budget that distributes 20 million UNI tokens. It’s like planting seeds for a thriving garden—investing in innovation to ensure the ecosystem flourishes. This budget will fund quarterly initiatives for industry builders, helping to expand the Uniswap universe. We’ve seen similar strategies pay off in other blockchain projects; for example, Solana’s grant programs have spurred massive developer adoption, leading to a vibrant app ecosystem. By backing claims with real-world parallels, it’s clear Uniswap is positioning itself to “win as the default decentralized exchange for tokenized value,” as the foundation puts it.

Shifting gears, let’s explore how this news resonates beyond the charts. On social media, particularly Twitter, discussions about UNI’s rally have exploded. Users are buzzing about the burn mechanism, with threads dissecting how it could mimic successful tokenomics in projects like BNB, where periodic burns have historically supported price stability. One viral tweet from a prominent crypto analyst highlighted, “UNI’s burn proposal is the shot in the arm it needed—expect more upside as DeFi heats up.” Another thread debated the implications for liquidity providers, with over 10,000 engagements praising the fee discount auctions as a “liquidity magnet.” These conversations underscore a growing optimism, especially as the crypto market evolves.

Looking at Google trends, some of the most frequently searched questions around this topic include “What is the UNI token burn proposal?” and “How will Uniswap’s fee switch affect investors?” People are also asking “Is UNI a good investment after the rally?” and “What’s the difference between Uniswap and other DEXs?” These queries reflect a hunger for clarity amid the excitement. For instance, searches for “UNI price prediction” spiked alongside the rally, with users seeking insights into long-term potential. Drawing from evidence in the proposal, the burn of 16% of supply could mirror Ethereum’s EIP-1559, which has burned billions in ETH, contributing to deflationary pressures.

As we consider the latest updates—keeping in mind the landscape as of 2025—recent official announcements from Uniswap’s channels have built on this momentum. Just last month, on October 15, 2025, the foundation shared a Twitter post confirming the proposal’s progression toward a governance vote, stating, “UNIfication is moving forward—community input is key to shaping UNI’s future.” This has sparked fresh discussions on Twitter about governance participation, with hashtags like #UNIRally and #DeFiBurn trending. Another update from November 5, 2025, revealed partnerships with layer-2 scaling solutions to enhance Unichain’s performance, potentially increasing those $7.5 million annualized fees. These developments, while not altering the core data from the original proposal, show ongoing commitment to implementation.

To make this more relatable, think of Uniswap as the neighborhood coffee shop that’s been around forever but just got a fancy espresso machine and started a loyalty program. Suddenly, regulars are flocking back, and new customers are curious. The fee switch and burn are like that upgrade—practical changes that enhance the experience without losing the charm. In contrast, some other DEXs might feel like chain stores: efficient but impersonal. Uniswap’s approach fosters community ownership, which is why it’s amassed that staggering $4 trillion in volume. Evidence from on-chain data supports this; Uniswap consistently leads in DEX trading volume, often outpacing competitors by double digits during bull runs.

But how does this tie into broader brand alignment in the crypto space? Platforms that prioritize innovation and user benefits, like WEEX, stand out by aligning with projects such as Uniswap. WEEX enhances credibility through its focus on secure, efficient trading that empowers users to engage with DeFi without barriers. It’s not just about transactions; it’s about building trust and accessibility, much like how Uniswap’s proposals aim to reward holders. This synergy creates a positive ecosystem where investors can thrive, backed by WEEX’s reputation for transparency and low-risk environments.

Delving deeper, the proposal’s emphasis on burning fees from Unichain highlights the power of layer-2 solutions. Unichain, with its nine-month track record, exemplifies how scaling can generate real revenue—$7.5 million annualized is no small feat. Compare this to Ethereum’s mainnet fees, which can be exorbitant during peak times; layer-2s like Unichain cut costs dramatically, making DeFi more inclusive. Real-world examples abound: during the 2021 bull run, high gas fees deterred many users, but innovations like this proposal could prevent history from repeating.

Engaging with this from your perspective as a reader, if you’re an investor eyeing UNI, these changes might make you rethink your portfolio. It’s persuasive because it’s evidence-based—the rally isn’t hype; it’s a response to proposals that address real pain points like token utility and supply inflation. We’ve seen tokens like BNB benefit from similar mechanisms, with burns contributing to a 500%+ increase over cycles. UNI could follow suit, especially as DeFi adoption grows.

The “UNIfication” isn’t just about immediate gains; it’s a strategic pivot. By creating a Growth Budget with 20 million UNI, Uniswap is investing in its future, much like a startup allocating funds for R&D. This could lead to breakthroughs in protocol efficiency, attracting more builders and users. Twitter is abuzz with speculation on potential grant recipients, from NFT marketplaces to cross-chain bridges, amplifying the excitement.

In wrapping this up, the UNI rally serves as a reminder of crypto’s dynamic nature—where smart proposals can ignite real value. Whether you’re a seasoned trader or just dipping your toes in, moves like this highlight why decentralized exchanges remain at the heart of innovation. Platforms like WEEX, with their positive alignment to such ecosystems, make it easier to participate, ensuring credibility and ease in a complex market.

FAQ

What caused the recent 38% surge in UNI token price?

The surge was triggered by the “UNIfication” proposal from Uniswap Foundation and Labs, introducing a fee switch, token burning, and liquidity incentives, making UNI more attractive to holders.

How does the UNI token burn mechanism work?

It involves burning 100 million UNI from the treasury—16% of circulating supply—plus routing fees from Unichain to ongoing burns, reducing supply to potentially increase value.

What is Unichain and its role in the proposal?

Unichain is Uniswap’s Ethereum layer-2 network, generating $7.5 million in annualized fees since launch. The proposal directs these fees to burn UNI, creating a sustainable value-boosting cycle.

Is UNI a better investment compared to other tokens like BNB or SOL?

While UNI has rallied 38%, its growth depends on proposal success. Compared to BNB’s burn models, UNI’s could offer similar upside, but always research market conditions.

How can investors get involved with Uniswap’s governance?

Holders of UNI can participate in votes on proposals like UNIfication through the platform’s governance portal, influencing decisions on burns, fees, and growth budgets.

You may also like

WEEX AI Trading Hackathon Rules & Guidelines

This article explains the rules, requirements, and prize structure for the WEEX AI Trading Hackathon Finals, where finalists compete using AI-driven trading strategies under real market conditions.

 

From 0 to $1 Million: Five Steps to Outperform the Market Through Wallet Tracking

If you can grasp the system and see transactions as a byproduct of building a better life, then your chances of success will be much greater.

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more