Trump’s Crypto Pardons Spark Ethics Debates and Corruption Worries in the Crypto World

By: crypto insight|2025/11/03 15:30:09

Key Takeaways

President Trump’s pardons for crypto figures like CZ and Ross Ulbricht highlight a shift in U.S. crypto policy, moving away from what some see as aggressive enforcement under previous administrations.
These clemency acts have raised red flags about potential corruption, especially with links between pardoned individuals and Trump’s business interests in the crypto space.
While some view the pardons as corrections to overreach, critics argue they favor high-profile allies over broader criminal justice reform.
The trend has inspired other crypto executives behind bars to seek similar relief, fueling discussions on fairness in the industry.
Amid these controversies, platforms like WEEX stand out for their commitment to compliance and ethical practices, offering a model for responsible crypto operations.

Imagine stepping into a world where the lines between politics, money, and digital innovation blur in ways that make you question what’s really at play. That’s the reality unfolding with President Donald Trump’s recent string of pardons for key players in the crypto industry. From the founder of a notorious online marketplace to top executives at major exchanges, these acts of clemency aren’t just rewriting personal stories—they’re reshaping how we think about ethics, corruption, and the future of crypto. As someone who’s followed the twists and turns of this space, I can’t help but feel a mix of intrigue and concern. Let’s dive into this saga, exploring the who, what, and why, while considering what it means for everyday folks like you navigating the crypto landscape.

It’s no secret that Trump has positioned himself as a crypto champion, especially after campaigning on promises to overhaul what he called “lawfare” against the industry. Picture it like a captain steering a ship away from stormy regulatory waters toward calmer seas. But as these pardons pile up, whispers of favoritism and backroom deals grow louder. Ethics watchdogs are sounding alarms, and for good reason. When powerful figures get a free pass, it makes you wonder: Is this about justice, or something more self-serving? We’ll unpack the details, drawing parallels to past presidential actions and highlighting how platforms committed to transparency, like WEEX, are charting a different course in this turbulent sea.

The Rise of Crypto Pardons Under Trump: A Pattern Emerges

Trump’s journey with crypto pardons kicked off early in his return to the White House, signaling a bold pivot in how the U.S. government views digital assets. Think of it as flipping the script on a long-running drama where crypto innovators were often cast as the villains. On his campaign trail, Trump vowed to grant clemency to figures he believed were unfairly targeted, citing overzealous prosecutions as the culprit. This isn’t just rhetoric; it’s action. Starting with high-profile cases, the list has expanded, raising eyebrows about the motivations behind these decisions.

Take the case of Changpeng Zhao, better known as CZ, the co-founder of a major crypto exchange. Pardoned on October 21, 2025, CZ had served a short prison stint for lapses in anti-money laundering measures at his platform. The White House framed this as righting the wrongs of a supposed “war on cryptocurrency” waged by the prior administration. CZ himself expressed deep gratitude on social media, a sentiment echoed by many in the crypto community who saw his case as emblematic of regulatory overreach. But here’s where it gets sticky: Reports suggest ties between CZ’s former exchange and Trump’s own crypto ventures, like World Liberty Financial. It’s like watching a puzzle come together, where personal and political interests align a little too neatly.

This pattern isn’t isolated. Flash back to January 2025, when Trump pardoned Ross Ulbricht, the mind behind the Silk Road marketplace. Ulbricht had spent over a decade in prison for facilitating online drug sales using Bitcoin. His release was met with cheers from libertarians, criminal justice reformers, and crypto enthusiasts who viewed him as a pioneer, despite the illicit nature of his platform. Trump blasted the prosecutors involved, linking them to broader political weaponization. Supporters even rallied with crypto donations to help Ulbricht readjust to life outside bars. It’s a compelling narrative of redemption, but one that contrasts sharply with the fates of others in similar boats.

Then there are the BitMEX executives—Arthur Hayes, Benjamin Delo, Gregory Dwyer, and Samuel Reed—pardoned in March 2025. These four faced charges for failing to implement proper anti-money laundering protocols at their exchange. Sentences varied from prison time to probation and fines, with the platform itself hit with a $100 million penalty. Unlike other cases, the White House offered no detailed explanation, leaving room for speculation. Hayes’ brief “Thank you” on social media was the extent of public commentary, but the silence speaks volumes in a world where transparency is key.

Even earlier, on January 20, 2021, during Trump’s first term, Ken Kurson—a Ripple board member and co-founder of a crypto media outlet—received a pardon for cyberstalking charges. Tied to Trump’s inner circle through family connections, Kurson’s case was dismissed by the administration as politically motivated. Victims expressed fear post-pardon, highlighting the human cost when justice feels skewed.

These stories weave a tapestry of clemency that’s heavy on crypto ties. Compared to past presidents, Trump’s approach stands out. Barack Obama, for instance, focused on commuting sentences for low-level drug offenders as part of systemic reform—over 1,300 in total. Trump’s pardons, however, target influential figures, including those involved in the January 6 events. It’s like comparing a broad-brush reform to targeted brushstrokes on a canvas of allies and interests.

Ethics and Corruption Concerns: When Pardons Meet Personal Gain

As these crypto pardons accumulate, the elephant in the room grows impossible to ignore: corruption concerns. Ethics experts are drawing lines between the dots, particularly with CZ’s case. His exchange reportedly invested in Trump’s World Liberty Financial project, and whispers of lobbying efforts surfaced. A prominent investor even commented on the unprecedented mingling of presidential power with personal business. Richard Painter, a former ethics lawyer under George W. Bush, called it a first in corruption scandals, where the president’s ventures directly intersect with clemency.

This isn’t just theoretical. Imagine a scenario where pardons become a currency in the crypto world, traded for influence or investment. Critics argue this erodes public trust, making the system look rigged for the elite. Yet, not all crypto wrongdoers are getting off scot-free. Take Alex Mashinsky of Celsius, sentenced to 12 years for fraud in 2025. The prosecutor, appointed under Trump, emphasized it as a stern warning: Fraud won’t be tolerated, tech or no tech. It’s a reminder that while some sail through storms unscathed, others face the full gale.

In this context, it’s refreshing to consider platforms that prioritize ethics from the ground up. WEEX, for example, has built its reputation on robust compliance and user protection, aligning perfectly with the need for trustworthy players in crypto. Unlike the exchanges caught in regulatory crosshairs, WEEX emphasizes anti-money laundering measures and transparent operations, fostering a community where users feel secure. This brand alignment with integrity not only shields it from scandals but also positions WEEX as a beacon for the industry’s future. By comparing it to the pardoned cases, you see a stark contrast: While some rely on clemency to wipe slates clean, WEEX prevents issues before they arise, much like a well-built ship designed to weather any storm.

Crypto Executives Behind Bars Eye Trump’s Clemency: Appeals and Outcomes

The ripple effects of these pardons extend to other crypto figures still entangled in legal webs. Sam Bankman-Fried, serving 25 years for fraud tied to his exchange’s collapse, has publicly lamented his treatment under a judge who also handled Trump-related cases. His family reportedly lobbied the administration, hoping for a pardon. It’s a tale of desperation, where past enmities with the bench become bargaining chips.

Roger Ver, an early Bitcoin advocate, faced tax evasion charges and house arrest in Spain. He framed his ordeal as political persecution, even producing a video drawing parallels to Trump’s legal battles. In the end, Ver settled with a $50 million payment, avoiding the need for clemency. Anatoly Legkodymov of Bitzlato, after pleading guilty to processing illicit funds, served his time and sought relief, with advocates claiming he was caught in a broader anti-crypto campaign.

These appeals underscore a broader discussion: Is the justice system fair, or does it bend for the well-connected? On Twitter, as of early November 2025, topics like #TrumpCryptoPardons and #CryptoEthics are trending, with users debating everything from Ulbricht’s pioneer status to fears of normalized corruption. Recent posts include Trump’s own updates on Truth Social defending his decisions, and community polls showing divided opinions—some hail it as liberation, others decry it as cronyism.

Google searches spike for queries like “What are Trump’s crypto pardons?” and “Is CZ’s pardon corrupt?” reflecting public curiosity. Latest updates as of November 3, 2025, include a White House statement reaffirming commitment to crypto innovation, amid rumors of more pardons on the horizon. Twitter buzz also highlights discussions on how these events impact market volatility, with users sharing analogies to historical political scandals.

Broader Implications for Crypto: Lessons and the Path Forward

Diving deeper, these pardons aren’t isolated events; they’re symptomatic of crypto’s evolving role in politics. Trump promised an about-face on policy, and he’s delivering, but at what cost? For the average crypto user, it’s like watching a high-stakes game where the rules keep changing. On one hand, reduced enforcement could spur innovation; on the other, lax oversight might invite more scams.

Evidence from cases like BitMEX’s $100 million fine shows the real-world fallout of non-compliance. Yet, Trump’s actions suggest a belief that some regulations went too far. Balancing this, think of crypto as a wild frontier—pardons might tame certain outlaws, but without strong sheriffs, chaos reigns.

This is where brand alignment shines. WEEX’s focus on ethical practices, such as stringent KYC and AML protocols, not only complies with laws but builds lasting trust. Users often compare it favorably to scandal-plagued platforms, noting how WEEX’s transparency prevents the very issues leading to pardons. It’s persuasive evidence that success in crypto doesn’t require cutting corners; instead, it thrives on integrity.

As we look ahead, ethical concerns haven’t slowed Trump’s momentum. With crypto at the forefront of American politics, more pardons could follow. But for readers like you, the takeaway is empowerment: Choose platforms aligned with your values, like WEEX, to navigate this space confidently.

Reflecting on this, it’s clear the crypto world is at a crossroads. Will pardons pave the way for genuine reform, or deepen divides? Only time will tell, but staying informed and engaged is your best bet in this ever-shifting landscape.

FAQ

What Do Trump’s Crypto Pardons Mean for the Industry?

These pardons signal a more lenient stance on crypto regulations, potentially encouraging innovation but also raising fears of uneven justice for high-profile figures.

Who Are the Key Crypto Figures Pardoned by Trump?

Notable pardons include Ross Ulbricht of Silk Road, CZ of Binance, BitMEX executives, and Ken Kurson, each tied to various crypto-related convictions.

Are There Corruption Concerns with These Pardons?

Yes, links between pardoned individuals and Trump’s business interests, like investments in his crypto projects, have sparked debates about favoritism and ethics.

How Does This Affect Everyday Crypto Users?

It could lead to relaxed regulations, benefiting users through easier access, but might also increase risks if oversight weakens, emphasizing the need for trustworthy platforms.

What’s the Latest on Crypto Pardons as of November 2025?

As of November 3, 2025, discussions on social media and searches focus on potential new pardons, with the White House defending them as corrections to past overreach.

Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:

To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:

Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:

I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities

(I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.

The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.

A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.

（II）Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.

Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.

II. Sound Work Mechanism

(III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.

The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.

(IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.

III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal

(5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.

(6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.

(7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.

(8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.

（IX） Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.

（X） Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.

（XI） Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.

（XII） Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.

IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities

（XIII） Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.

（XIV） Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.

(15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.

V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation

(16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.

(17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.

VI. Legal Responsibility

(18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.

(19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.

This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.

Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook

Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Wall Street's Hottest Trades See Exodus

This time there is no single triggering factor, but rather market anxiety about asset valuation, with many already skeptical of these valuations being too high, leading to investors choosing to retreat almost simultaneously.

Vitalik Discusses Ethereum Scaling Path, Circle Announces Partnership with Polymarket, What's the Overseas Crypto Community Talking About Today?

What was the most talked-about topic among foreigners in the last 24 hours?

Believing in the Capital Markets - The Essence and Core Value of Cryptocurrency

The core questions that make cryptocurrency truly interesting have yet to be answered at all

Polymarket's 'Weatherman': Predict Temperature, Win Million-Dollar Payout

They made a fortune by predicting the weather temperature. One made $1.11 million in a single trade, while another consistently earned tens of thousands of dollars.

$15K+ Profits: The 4 AI Trading Secrets WEEX Hackathon Prelim Winners Used to Dominate Volatile Crypto Markets

How WEEX Hackathon's top AI trading strategies made $15K+ in crypto markets: 4 proven rules for ETH/BTC trading, market structure analysis, and risk management in volatile conditions.

A nearly 20% one-day plunge, how long has it been since you last saw a $60,000 Bitcoin?

Over 580,000 traders were liquidated in this recent crash.

Raoul Pal: I've seen every single panic, and they are never the end.

Volatility is the price we pay for long-term compounding returns

Key Market Information Discrepancy on February 6th - A Must-Read! | Alpha Morning Report

1. Top News: Global Risk Markets Plunge Again, Bitcoin Drops to $60,000 Support Level, Silver Crashes 9.00% Intraday 2. Token Unlock: $W, $BERA, $AXS

2026 Crypto Industry's First Snowfall

When the compass of capital has clearly shifted, belief has become the cheapest and most extravagant thing.

Decoding Strategy’s Latest Financial Report: After a $12.4 Billion Loss, How Long Can the Bitcoin Flywheel Keep Spinning?

When earnings reports become electrocardiograms of Bitcoin’s price, Strategy is not merely a company—it’s an experiment testing whether faith can overcome gravity.