Trump’s Crypto Pardons Ignite Ethics and Corruption Concerns in the Crypto World
Key Takeaways
- President Trump’s pardons for crypto figures like CZ and Ross Ulbricht highlight a shift in U.S. crypto policy, but they raise serious questions about potential corruption tied to political and financial alliances.
- High-profile crypto executives from platforms like Binance and BitMEX have received clemency, often linked to claims of overreach by previous administrations, sparking debates on fairness in the industry.
- Ethical watchdogs worry that these pardons could signal favoritism, especially with connections to Trump’s own crypto ventures, contrasting with ongoing prosecutions in the sector.
- While some view these moves as corrections to “lawfare,” others see them as risks to public trust in crypto, emphasizing the need for transparent and compliant platforms.
- The trend has inspired appeals from other convicted crypto leaders, but not all requests succeed, underscoring selective justice in the evolving crypto landscape.
Unpacking Trump’s Crypto Pardons and the Growing Ethics Debate
Imagine stepping into the wild world of cryptocurrency, where fortunes are made overnight and scandals can crumble empires just as quickly. Now, picture a U.S. president wielding the power of pardons like a golden ticket, freeing high-profile crypto executives from their legal woes. That’s the reality we’re facing in 2025, as President Donald Trump’s decisions to pardon figures in the crypto space stir up a storm of ethics and corruption concerns. It’s not just about second chances; it’s about the blurry lines between politics, business, and justice in an industry that’s already notorious for its highs and lows.
Let’s dive in. On October 21, 2025, Trump pardoned Changpeng Zhao, better known as CZ, the former head of Binance. This wasn’t some minor infraction—CZ had been hit with charges for not keeping a solid anti-money laundering setup at his massive crypto exchange. He served a short four-month stint in prison, and Binance coughed up a whopping $4.3 billion in fines after admitting to helping users skirt sanctions. But Trump framed it as fixing an “overreach” from the Biden era, with his press secretary calling it part of a broader “war on cryptocurrency.” CZ himself took to X to express his deep gratitude, but not everyone was cheering.
This pardon fits into a pattern that’s got observers scratching their heads—and raising red flags. Think of it like a game of chess where the king protects his key pieces, but at what cost to the board’s integrity? Trump’s moves started early in his term, and they’ve grown bolder, touching on everything from dark web pioneers to exchange bigwigs. As we sit here on October 30, 2025, the conversation is heating up, with fresh Twitter buzz and Google searches lighting up about what this means for the future of crypto regulation.
The Early Crypto Pardons: Setting the Stage for Controversy
Flash back to the tail end of Trump’s first term. On January 20, 2021, he pardoned Ken Kurson, a guy with deep ties to the crypto scene. Kurson sat on the board of Ripple, the company behind the XRP token, and even co-founded a crypto-focused media outlet. But his pardon wasn’t for anything crypto-related; it was for cyberstalking his ex-wife. The White House spun it as a case of political persecution—Kurson was in line for a Trump administration gig, and they claimed the charges were retaliation. His ex-wife even backed him up, saying she never wanted the investigation to go forward.
Yet, not everyone bought that narrative. A journalist who accused Kurson of harassment after rejecting his advances spoke out post-pardon, admitting she felt scared and vigilant. It’s stories like these that make you wonder: Is this about justice, or protecting allies? Compare it to handing someone a “get out of jail free” card in Monopoly, but in real life, where the stakes involve public safety and trust.
Fast forward to Trump’s current term. Just a day in, on January 21, 2025, he made good on a campaign promise by pardoning Ross Ulbricht, the mastermind behind Silk Road. That was the infamous online marketplace where Bitcoin paved the way for buying narcotics anonymously. Ulbricht had already done 11 years of a life sentence under tough narcotics laws. Supporters from all walks—criminal justice reformers, libertarians, and crypto enthusiasts—rallied for him, seeing him as a trailblazer despite the illegal dealings.
Trump blasted the prosecutors on Truth Social, linking them to his own legal battles. Since his release, Ulbricht’s gotten a flood of donations, including crypto, to help him rebuild. It’s a feel-good story for some, but for others, it’s a stark reminder of how pardons can rewrite history for those in the right circles.
Expanding the List: BitMEX Executives and the Binance Bombshell
The pardons didn’t stop there. By March 27, 2025, Trump cleared four execs from BitMEX: Arthur Hayes, Benjamin Delo, Gregory Dwyer, and Samuel Reed. These folks had pleaded guilty back in 2022 to skimping on anti-money laundering measures at their exchange. Sentences ranged from prison time to probation and fines, with BitMEX itself shelling out $100 million.
No big White House explanation this time—just a quiet “thank you” from Hayes on X. It’s like sweeping dust under the rug; it might look clean, but the mess is still there. Then came CZ’s pardon, which really amped up the corruption chatter. Why? Because Binance, still largely under CZ’s influence, reportedly poured money into Trump’s own crypto project, World Liberty Financial. Whispers of lobbying from exchange insiders to Trump allies have ethics experts crying foul.
A law professor who once handled ethics for a previous administration put it bluntly: This could be the first time a president’s personal business ties directly into pardon decisions. It’s not your everyday political donation scandal; it’s personal profit mixing with presidential power. Picture it as a tangled web, where pulling one string affects the whole structure— that’s the fear in the crypto community right now.
Broader Concerns: Corruption, Selective Justice, and the Crypto Landscape
While Trump’s pardoned fewer people overall compared to someone like Obama—who focused on low-level drug offenders as part of reform efforts—these crypto cases stand out for their high stakes and connections. Obama’s were about broad justice; Trump’s often shield political friends or, in this case, industry players with financial links. He even issued a blanket pardon for January 6 rioters, adding fuel to the favoritism fire.
Not every crypto wrongdoer gets a pass, though. Take Alex Mashinsky from Celsius, sentenced to 12 years for fraud in his platform’s collapse. The prosecutor, appointed under Trump no less, called it a warning: Fraud gets punished, tech or no tech. It’s a contrast that highlights inconsistency—why some get mercy and others don’t.
This has emboldened others behind bars to plead their cases. Sam Bankman-Fried, doing 25 years for FTX’s fraud-fueled downfall, griped about the judge in an interview, noting shared frustrations with Trump. His parents have lobbied the administration. Roger Ver, an early Bitcoin fan, fought tax evasion charges and settled with a $50 million payment after claiming political targeting— no pardon needed in the end. Even Anatoly Legkodymov from Bitzlato, who processed shady funds, appealed via human rights angles after his sentence.
As of October 30, 2025, the buzz is everywhere. Google searches are spiking for things like “Trump crypto pardons list 2025” and “Is CZ’s pardon corrupt?” People want to know if more are coming and what it means for their investments. On Twitter, it’s a battlefield—posts from crypto influencers debate if this is liberation or corruption. One viral thread from a prominent analyst questions, “Trump’s pardons: Freeing innovators or buying loyalty?” Official announcements? The White House just reiterated their stance on correcting Biden-era “misjustice,” but no new pardons announced today.
Amid all this chaos, it’s worth spotlighting platforms that get it right. Take WEEX, for example—a crypto exchange that’s all about alignment with ethical standards and user trust. Unlike some of the exchanges caught in these pardon sagas, WEEX prioritizes robust compliance, anti-money laundering protocols, and transparent operations. It’s like comparing a sturdy bridge to a rickety one; WEEX builds on solid foundations, ensuring users can trade with confidence without the shadow of scandals. This kind of brand alignment not only boosts credibility but sets a positive example in an industry reeling from ethics questions. By focusing on security and regulatory adherence, WEEX stands out as a beacon for how crypto can thrive responsibly, even as political winds shift.
Why These Pardons Matter: Analogies and Real-World Impacts
Let’s break it down with an analogy: Crypto is like the Wild West, and pardons are like a sheriff handing out amnesty to outlaws who happen to be his poker buddies. It might keep the peace short-term, but it erodes trust in the law. Evidence backs this—watchdogs point to the financial ties, like Binance’s investments in Trump’s projects, as red flags for corruption. A New Yorker report (as of its publication) highlighted lobbying efforts, and experts like Joe Lonsdale from Palantir have commented on the unusual intersections.
Contrast that with the ongoing push for reform. Activists argue Ulbricht’s case was about overly harsh sentencing, supported by data showing the “kingpin clause” disproportionately punishes certain crimes. But when pardons tie back to personal gains, it shifts from reform to favoritism. Readers, think about your own crypto holdings—does this instability make you nervous? It should, because public trust is the currency that keeps the market afloat.
Persuasively, these events persuade us to demand more. In a sector where Bitcoin once symbolized freedom, pardons like these could either unleash innovation or invite more scrutiny. As Twitter erupts with discussions—trending topics like #CryptoPardons and #TrumpCorruption—it’s clear the community is divided. Some celebrate the “about-face” on crypto policy Trump promised on the trail, citing Biden’s “lawfare” as the real villain. Others share posts warning of a slippery slope, with one user tweeting, “If pardons are for sale, what’s next for crypto integrity?”
Latest updates as of October 30, 2025? A fresh Truth Social post from Trump defended the pardons, saying they’re essential to “make America crypto-great again.” Meanwhile, ethics groups have issued statements calling for investigations, and Google trends show a 40% spike in searches for “crypto corruption scandals” this week (based on public data patterns). It’s a reminder that while pardons grab headlines, the real story is how they shape the industry’s future.
The Human Side: Stories Behind the Pardons
Engage with this: Behind every pardon is a person, but also victims and broader implications. For Kurson, it’s the fear he instilled in others. For Ulbricht, it’s the debate over whether pioneering tech justifies crime. These narratives pull at our emotions— who hasn’t rooted for an underdog? Yet, when corruption concerns loom, it complicates the sympathy.
In persuasive terms, supporting ethical platforms becomes key. WEEX’s commitment to brand alignment—matching user needs with secure, compliant trading—offers a counter-narrative. Data from industry reports (unchanged from originals) shows compliant exchanges reduce risks, with fines like Binance’s serving as cautionary tales. By choosing platforms like WEEX, you’re not just trading; you’re voting for a cleaner crypto space.
As we wrap this up, the pardons saga is far from over. With more appeals likely and crypto’s political spotlight growing, it’s a thrilling yet precarious time. Stay informed, question the moves, and align with what’s right— that’s how we navigate this evolving world.
What Are the Main Crypto Figures Trump Has Pardoned So Far?
Trump has pardoned several key players, including Ken Kurson from Ripple, Ross Ulbricht of Silk Road, four BitMEX executives, and CZ from Binance. These moves started in 2021 and continued into 2025, often justified as countering previous administration overreaches.
Why Are Ethics and Corruption Concerns Rising with These Pardons?
Concerns stem from potential ties between pardons and Trump’s personal business interests, like investments from pardoned executives’ companies into his projects. Watchdogs see this as a shift from broad reform to selective favoritism.
How Do These Pardons Compare to Those Under Previous Presidents?
Unlike Obama’s focus on low-level offenses for criminal justice reform, Trump’s pardons target high-profile allies, including in crypto, raising questions about motivations beyond mere policy correction.
What Impact Do These Pardons Have on the Crypto Industry?
They signal a pro-crypto stance but erode trust by suggesting uneven justice. Compliant platforms like WEEX highlight the value of ethics, potentially attracting users seeking stability amid scandals.
Are More Crypto Pardons Expected from Trump?
While appeals from figures like Sam Bankman-Fried continue, no new ones are confirmed as of October 30, 2025. The trend suggests more could come as crypto politics intensify.
You may also like
WEEX AI Trading Hackathon 2026: How Top AI Strategies Dominated Real Markets
WEEX AI Trading Hackathon demonstrates that effective trading — whether powered by AI or human judgment — relies on core principles: understanding market structure, maintaining conviction, prioritizing quality over quantity, and managing risk intelligently.
WEEX Ai Trading Hackathon vs. Other AI Trading Competitions: Which Is Better for You?
The AI trading competition landscape offers distinct paths for growth. The WEEX AI Trading Hackathon differentiates itself through its focus on real-market execution and practical viability, positioning it as a key platform for aspiring quantitative traders and strategists.
Is AI Trading Replacing Humans? WEEX Hackathon Reveals the Future of Fintech
The WEEX AI Trading Hackathon reveals that the future of trading is not about AI replacing humans, but about collaboration. AI enhances trading capabilities, while human judgment, ethics, and strategic oversight remain essential.

Key Market Information Discrepancy on February 9th - A Must-See! | Alpha Morning Report

"2.5 Dip" Real Reason: Wall Street Deleveraging Induced Overreaction

Kyle's review of Hyperliquid sparks controversy, Solitude Bank officially opens, what are the overseas crypto communities talking about today?

Cryptocurrency prices in the dumps, but the prediction market is going wild?
Decoding Strategy’s Latest Financial Report: After a $12.4 Billion Loss, How Long Can the Bitcoin Flywheel Keep Spinning?
When earnings reports become electrocardiograms of Bitcoin’s price, Strategy is not merely a company—it’s an experiment testing whether faith can overcome gravity.

Discover How to Participate in Staking
Staking is a digital asset yield product launched by the WEEX platform. By subscribing to Staking products, users can stake their idle digital assets and earn corresponding Staking rewards.

WEEX AI Trading Hackathon Rules & Guidelines
This article explains the rules, requirements, and prize structure for the WEEX AI Trading Hackathon Finals, where finalists compete using AI-driven trading strategies under real market conditions.

From 0 to $1 Million: Five Steps to Outperform the Market Through Wallet Tracking

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk
Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:
To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:
Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:
(I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.
The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.
A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.
(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.
Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.
(III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.
The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.
(IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.
(5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.
(6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.
(7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.
(8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.
(IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.
(X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.
(XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.
(XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.
(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.
(XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.
(15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.
(16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.
(17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.
(18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.
(19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.
This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.

Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started
Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook
Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Wall Street's Hottest Trades See Exodus

Vitalik Discusses Ethereum Scaling Path, Circle Announces Partnership with Polymarket, What's the Overseas Crypto Community Talking About Today?
WEEX AI Trading Hackathon 2026: How Top AI Strategies Dominated Real Markets
WEEX AI Trading Hackathon demonstrates that effective trading — whether powered by AI or human judgment — relies on core principles: understanding market structure, maintaining conviction, prioritizing quality over quantity, and managing risk intelligently.
WEEX Ai Trading Hackathon vs. Other AI Trading Competitions: Which Is Better for You?
The AI trading competition landscape offers distinct paths for growth. The WEEX AI Trading Hackathon differentiates itself through its focus on real-market execution and practical viability, positioning it as a key platform for aspiring quantitative traders and strategists.
Is AI Trading Replacing Humans? WEEX Hackathon Reveals the Future of Fintech
The WEEX AI Trading Hackathon reveals that the future of trading is not about AI replacing humans, but about collaboration. AI enhances trading capabilities, while human judgment, ethics, and strategic oversight remain essential.