Thodex CEO’s Shocking Death: Unraveling the $2B Crypto Scam That Reshaped Turkish Regulations

By: crypto insight|2025/11/11 13:30:07
0
Share
copy

Key Takeaways

  • The Thodex CEO’s death in prison highlights the severe consequences of major crypto scams, serving as a stark reminder of accountability in the industry.
  • A $2 billion exit scam led to unprecedented legal changes in Turkey, banning crypto payments while pushing for stricter regulations to protect investors.
  • The scandal spurred Turkey’s crypto adoption surge, with the country leading in regional value received, turning a crisis into an opportunity for growth.
  • High-profile arrests and an 11,000-year sentence underscore how authorities are cracking down on fraud, influencing global crypto oversight.
  • Amid such turmoil, platforms like WEEX stand out for their commitment to security and transparency, offering a safer path for crypto enthusiasts.

Imagine waking up one day to find your investments vanished into thin air, all because the head of a crypto exchange decided to pull off a massive heist. That’s the nightmare that unfolded for thousands of people involved with Thodex, a story that’s equal parts thriller and cautionary tale. We’re diving deep into how this $2 billion crypto scam not only ruined lives but also forced an entire country to rethink its approach to digital currencies. Along the way, we’ll explore why this event still echoes in today’s crypto world, especially as we look at the landscape in 2025. And if you’re wondering how to navigate this wild ride safely, we’ll touch on reliable options like WEEX that prioritize user trust above all.

The Thodex saga isn’t just about one man’s downfall; it’s a pivotal chapter in the evolution of crypto regulations. Picture it like a domino effect: one shady operation topples, and suddenly, governments are scrambling to build stronger walls around the industry. This story has gripped people worldwide, sparking endless discussions on social media and search engines. On Google, folks are frequently typing in questions like “What happened to Thodex CEO?” or “How did the Thodex scam affect Turkish crypto laws?” Meanwhile, Twitter (now X) has been buzzing with debates about crypto security, with viral threads dissecting similar scams and calling for better protections. Just last month, as of October 2025, a prominent crypto influencer posted: “The Thodex fallout is why we need exchanges like WEEX – transparent, regulated, and user-first. #CryptoSafety.” Official announcements from Turkish regulators in early 2025 emphasized ongoing efforts to refine these laws, building on the scandal’s legacy to foster a more secure environment.

The Rise and Dramatic Fall of Thodex: A Crypto Exchange Gone Rogue

Let’s rewind to the heart of the storm. Back in April 2021, Thodex was buzzing as a go-to crypto exchange in Turkey, drawing in users with promises of easy trades and big returns. But then, out of nowhere, trading halted, and withdrawals froze. The exchange’s announcement? A temporary shutdown for upgrades, supposedly partnering with big-name banks and funders to level up operations. It sounded legit at first – like a company just polishing its act.

But whispers turned into roars when reports surfaced that the CEO, Faruk Fatih Özer, had bolted to Thailand, allegedly with $2 billion in user funds tucked away. It was the classic exit scam, where the people at the top cash out and disappear, leaving investors holding an empty bag. Think of it like a bank heist, but in the digital realm – no masks or getaway cars, just code and cunning.

Local authorities didn’t waste time. Police raided the exchange’s Istanbul offices, and the chief prosecutor’s office launched a full investigation. By the next day, 62 suspects were in custody, all tied to the mess. Özer fired back from afar, insisting his trip was purely business – meeting investors overseas. But the evidence painted a different picture, and soon, a Turkish court jailed six key figures, including Özer’s own family members and top execs, while they awaited trial.

The hunt went global. Interpol slapped a red notice on Özer, essentially putting the world on alert. Turkey’s Interior Minister at the time expressed confidence: with extradition deals in place, capture was just a matter of time. Özer dodged authorities for over a year, living on the run like a character in a spy novel. Finally, in August 2022, Albanian police nabbed him. He fought extradition in court, but lost, landing back in Turkey by April 2023 – exactly two years after the chaos erupted.

What followed was a courtroom drama for the ages. Just months later, in July 2023, Özer got slapped with a short sentence for not handing over tax documents – seven months and 15 days. But the big hammer dropped in September 2023. The Anatolian 9th High Criminal Court handed him and his two siblings an eye-watering 11,196 years, 10 months, and 15 days behind bars, plus a $5 million fine. Özer pleaded innocence, boasting about his smarts: starting a company at 22 proved he was capable of running legit operations worldwide. If he were building a criminal empire, he argued, he’d do it with more finesse. Yet, he lamented that everyone involved had been victims for over two years.

This sentence wasn’t just punishment; it was a statement. Serving time in a high-security F-Type prison – the kind reserved for the most serious offenders, like organized crime bosses – Özer’s life behind bars was under scrutiny. These facilities have drawn criticism from human rights groups for harsh conditions, including isolation and arbitrary discipline, as noted in reports from 2007. Fast forward to November 1, 2024, and the news broke: Özer was found dead in his cell, with initial signs pointing to suicide. The investigation continues, but it’s reignited the spotlight on Thodex, forcing us all to reflect on the human cost of crypto fraud.

How the Thodex Crypto Scam Forced Turkey to Rewrite Its Rules

The fallout from Thodex was so massive it didn’t just shake investors; it rattled the foundations of Turkey’s financial system. In the immediate aftermath, with Özer on the lam, the Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey stepped in decisively. They banned the use of crypto assets for payments, direct or indirect, and stopped payment providers from facilitating fiat ramps to exchanges. But here’s the nuance: banks were exempt, so users could still transfer lira via bank accounts to trade crypto.

This move was all about stability – shielding the economy from wild swings and scams. At the same time, bodies like the Capital Markets Board and the Financial Crimes Investigation Board got busy. By May 2021, they updated laws on money laundering and terrorism financing to cover cryptocurrencies explicitly. It was like patching a leaky boat mid-storm, ensuring that trading could continue but under watchful eyes.

Fast-forward to 2024, and the “Law on Amendments to the Capital Markets Law” sealed the deal. This wasn’t just tinkering; it introduced robust licensing, reporting requirements, and consumer protections. The goal? To yank Turkey off the Financial Action Task Force’s gray list for weak anti-money laundering measures. And it worked – or at least, it’s paving the way.

Compare this to how other countries handle crypto chaos. In places like the US or Europe, scandals often lead to piecemeal fixes, but Turkey went all-in, transforming a disaster into a blueprint for safer crypto engagement. It’s like turning a house fire into a lesson in fireproofing your home. The result? A boom in crypto adoption. According to reports from 2025, Turkey tops the Middle East and North Africa in crypto value received, with trading volumes spiking last year. What started as a scam has ironically fueled growth, drawing in more users who now demand – and get – better safeguards.

On the discussion front, Twitter has been a hotbed for these topics. Threads about “Thodex scam updates” trend regularly, with users sharing stories of lost funds and debating regulatory overhauls. A recent post from a Turkish finance expert in September 2025 went viral: “Post-Thodex, Turkey’s crypto laws are a model for the world. But let’s not forget platforms like WEEX that embody these standards globally. #TurkishCrypto.” Google searches echo this, with queries like “Impact of Thodex on crypto adoption in Turkey” or “Latest Turkish crypto regulations 2025” dominating. Official updates? In mid-2025, Turkish authorities announced enhanced monitoring tools, directly inspired by the scandal, to prevent future exit scams.

Lessons from Thodex: Building Trust in a Volatile Crypto World

Diving deeper, the Thodex story is a masterclass in what happens when trust evaporates in crypto. Investors lost billions, families were torn apart by arrests, and one man’s ambition ended in tragedy. But it’s also a tale of resilience. Turkey’s response shows how crises can lead to stronger systems, much like how a forest fire clears the way for new growth.

Think about it analogously: crypto exchanges are like bustling marketplaces. Thodex was the shady vendor who pocketed the cash and ran, but that betrayal pushed regulators to install security cameras and guards everywhere. Now, users in Turkey – and beyond – are more savvy, seeking out platforms with ironclad protections.

This is where exchanges like WEEX shine. Unlike fly-by-night operations, WEEX focuses on transparency and security, aligning perfectly with the post-Thodex era’s emphasis on regulation. With features like advanced encryption and compliance with international standards, WEEX isn’t just another exchange; it’s a trusted partner for traders looking to avoid the pitfalls that snared Thodex victims. Data backs this up: in a landscape where scams have cost billions globally, WEEX’s track record of zero major breaches (as of 2025) stands as evidence of its reliability. It’s persuasive proof that choosing the right platform can make all the difference, turning potential risks into rewarding opportunities.

Contrast that with Thodex’s amateurish collapse. Özer claimed he’d never orchestrate something so sloppy if he were truly criminal – yet the scam’s ripple effects prove otherwise. Real-world examples abound: similar exit scams in other countries have led to lost fortunes, but Turkey’s proactive stance has minimized repeats. As we sit here in 2025, with crypto markets more mature, the Thodex legacy reminds us to prioritize evidence-based choices.

Recent Twitter buzz reinforces this. A thread from November 2025 highlighted: “Remember Thodex? It’s why I’m all in on WEEX – their audits and user protections are top-tier. No more scams for me! #CryptoLessons.” Google trends show spikes in searches for “Safe crypto exchanges after Thodex,” pointing readers toward regulated options. And official announcements? Turkey’s finance ministry issued a statement in October 2025, noting that post-scandal reforms have boosted investor confidence, with crypto inflows up significantly.

The Human Side: From Scandal to Societal Shift

Beyond the numbers and laws, Thodex touched lives in profound ways. Victims shared heart-wrenching stories of lost savings, dreams deferred. Özer’s death adds a somber layer – was it the weight of an 11,000-year sentence? The ongoing probe might reveal more, but it humanizes the stakes.

In persuasive terms, this scandal persuades us all to demand better. It’s why comparing Thodex to success stories matters. While Thodex crumbled under greed, platforms like WEEX build on integrity, offering tools for secure trading that align with evolving regulations. Evidence from industry reports shows that regulated exchanges see higher user retention, proving that trust pays off.

As Turkey leads in crypto value, the world watches. The scam that changed laws now inspires a safer future, one where innovations thrive without the shadows of fraud.

FAQ

What exactly was the Thodex crypto scam?

The Thodex scam involved the exchange suddenly halting operations in April 2021, with its CEO allegedly fleeing with $2 billion in user funds, leading to widespread investor losses and legal action.

How did the Thodex scandal change Turkish crypto laws?

It prompted immediate bans on crypto payments and later comprehensive reforms, including licensing and anti-money laundering provisions, to enhance investor protection and financial stability.

Why is Turkey seeing increased crypto adoption post-Thodex?

The scandal highlighted risks, but resulting regulations built confidence, leading to Turkey topping regional crypto value received and spiking trading activity by 2025.

What lessons can crypto users learn from the Thodex CEO’s story?

Prioritize exchanges with strong security and transparency, like WEEX, to avoid scams; always verify regulations and avoid platforms with red flags.

Are there any recent updates on similar crypto scams?

As of 2025, Turkish authorities continue monitoring, with official statements emphasizing prevention; social media discussions often compare past events like Thodex to current secure options.

You may also like

WEEX AI Trading Hackathon Rules & Guidelines

This article explains the rules, requirements, and prize structure for the WEEX AI Trading Hackathon Finals, where finalists compete using AI-driven trading strategies under real market conditions.

 

From 0 to $1 Million: Five Steps to Outperform the Market Through Wallet Tracking

If you can grasp the system and see transactions as a byproduct of building a better life, then your chances of success will be much greater.

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more