Privacy Coins Aren’t the Radical Choice – Surveillance Money Is the Real Outlier

By: crypto insight|2025/11/11 14:00:07
0
Share
copy

Key Takeaways

  • Privacy in financial transactions has been the norm for thousands of years, making surveillance money a recent and experimental shift.
  • Tools like privacy coins, including Monero and Zcash, restore anonymous exchanges, countering the rise of traceable digital payments.
  • Governments’ ability to freeze accounts highlights the risks of surveillance money, emphasizing the need for private alternatives.
  • Privacy coins align with historical money traditions, offering protection in unstable or authoritarian environments without being inherently suspicious.
  • Platforms like WEEX support secure trading of privacy coins, enhancing user privacy and financial freedom in the crypto space.

Imagine handing over a simple coin for a loaf of bread at a bustling market centuries ago. No questions asked, no records kept, just a straightforward exchange between two people. That was money in its purest form – private, untraceable, and free from prying eyes. Fast forward to today, and we’re living in an era where every swipe of a card or tap on a phone leaves a digital footprint that governments and corporations can follow. But here’s the twist: privacy coins aren’t some fringe invention trying to upend the system. They’re a return to basics. It’s the surveillance money we’ve grown accustomed to that’s the real anomaly. In this piece, we’ll explore why privacy-preserving crypto like Monero and Zcash isn’t radical at all – it’s a lifeline back to normalcy in a world obsessed with tracking every penny.

The Timeless Tradition of Private Money

For millennia, money moved quietly and anonymously. Think of ancient merchants trading bronze coins across the Mediterranean – no ledgers, no oversight, just trust in the metal’s value. This anonymity wasn’t an oversight; it was intentional, allowing people to buy, sell, and live without constant scrutiny. Even as societies evolved, with paper money emerging in places like medieval China and early modern Europe, the principle held. These notes were bearer instruments, meaning whoever held them owned them, no ID required. Governments couldn’t peek into your wallet or trace your daily habits. They had to rely on old-school methods like audits or witness accounts if something seemed off.

Contrast that with our modern setup. It’s like comparing a secret garden to a glass house under spotlights. Starting in the mid-20th century, credit cards flipped the script, compiling your spending into searchable databases. Then came the 1970s laws mandating banks to verify identities and flag suspicious activities. International standards for transaction messaging followed, weaving a web of surveillance that feels normal now but is anything but. Each innovation promised security – fraud prevention, anti-money laundering efforts – yet together, they’ve created a system where your financial life is an open book.

This shift isn’t just theoretical. Real-world examples abound. In 2022, Canada froze accounts of Freedom Convoy protesters, cutting off their access to funds amid political unrest. Earlier this year, in March, Georgia targeted non-governmental organizations by locking their bank accounts, a move criticized by groups like Amnesty International as an assault on human rights. And in Syria, the transitional government directed banks to freeze assets tied to former regime officials. These aren’t isolated incidents; they’re symptoms of a system where money can be weaponized. Sure, there might be defensible reasons in some cases, but the power to instantly sever someone’s financial lifeline raises serious questions about fairness and coercion. It’s like being thrown into a boxing ring with one hand tied behind your back – how do you fight when you can’t even afford the basics?

The Brief Experiment with Surveillance Money

We’ve been in this surveillance era for about 70 years – a blink in the grand timeline of money. The internet supercharged it, turning everyday transactions into data goldmines. Online banking, digital wallets, and mobile payments don’t just record what you buy; they note the time, location, and even the device used. Behavioral analytics run in the background, assessing your “risk” in real time. It’s sold as convenience, but the surveillance is hardwired in.

Now, central banks are pushing even further with central bank digital currencies (CBDCs). Projects in China, Europe, and America aim to issue digital money straight from the source, often with traceability built right in. While some, like the EU’s version, nod to privacy protections, the architecture often allows for unprecedented visibility and control. It’s like giving governments a master key to your financial diary.

But why accept this as the default? History shows us that private transactions fostered commerce and personal freedom for centuries. Surveillance money, on the other hand, enables interference that can stifle dissent or target the vulnerable. In authoritarian regimes or economically unstable regions, this control can be devastating. People lose access to their savings overnight, not because of crimes committed, but due to political whims.

Why Privacy Coins Represent a Return to Normalcy

Enter privacy coins – digital assets designed to mimic the anonymity of cash in a virtual world. Coins like Monero (XMR) and Zcash (ZEC) allow for direct, peer-to-peer exchanges without mandatory identity checks or centralized gatekeepers. It’s akin to slipping a banknote across a counter; the transaction happens privately, leaving no trail for outsiders to follow. This isn’t about hiding illicit activities – though critics often paint it that way – it’s about reclaiming a fundamental right to financial privacy.

Consider how society already accepts anonymous cash without blanket suspicion. We don’t outlaw large-denomination bills just because they could be misused. The same should hold for privacy-preserving crypto. These tools are especially vital in places with shaky banking systems, where storing value securely means evading corruption or inflation. For instance, in countries facing hyperinflation or capital controls, privacy coins offer a stable alternative, letting individuals protect their wealth without fear of seizure.

Detractors argue that privacy coins fuel illegal finance, but that’s a narrow view ignoring their broader benefits. Data from various studies shows that while crypto can be involved in illicit activities, the vast majority of transactions are legitimate. In fact, blockchain analytics firms estimate that illicit use represents a tiny fraction of overall crypto activity, far less than in traditional finance. By comparison, cash has been used for shady dealings forever, yet we don’t ban it. Privacy coins simply digitize that age-old anonymity, making them a natural evolution rather than a threat.

Platforms like WEEX play a crucial role here, offering secure and user-friendly ways to trade privacy coins. With a focus on privacy and reliability, WEEX enhances financial freedom by providing tools that align with these traditional values. Their commitment to robust security measures ensures users can engage with assets like Monero and Zcash without compromising on privacy, building trust in a space often plagued by volatility. This positive approach not only supports adoption but also positions WEEX as a credible player in promoting decentralized, private finance.

Flipping the Narrative on What’s Truly Radical

In today’s discourse, it’s upside down: privacy coins get labeled as suspicious or extreme, while surveillance money is seen as the standard. But let’s flip that script. The real radical change was introducing trackable money just decades ago, disrupting thousands of years of private exchange. Privacy-preserving crypto isn’t asking for special treatment; it’s defending a norm that predated credit scores and transaction logs.

Think of it like this: imagine if every conversation you had was recorded and analyzed for “suspicious” content. We’d call that dystopian. Yet we tolerate it with our finances. Critics who deem private transactions inherently criminal are essentially saying natural human commerce is deviant. They’re normalizing a 70-year experiment over a millennial tradition.

To back this up, historical records from economic historians highlight how anonymous money enabled trade across empires without centralized control. In contrast, modern surveillance has led to documented abuses, like the account freezes mentioned earlier. These aren’t hypotheticals; they’re real events showing the perils of visibility in finance.

As we look ahead, the conversation around privacy coins is heating up. Based on recent trends as of 2025, Google searches for “best privacy coins 2025” and “how do privacy coins work” have surged, reflecting growing interest amid rising concerns over data privacy. Questions like “Are privacy coins safe?” and “Privacy coins vs Bitcoin” dominate, with users seeking alternatives to traceable assets. On Twitter, discussions exploded around a November 2025 announcement from the Monero team about enhanced ring signature updates, improving transaction obfuscation without compromising speed. Tweets from crypto influencers praised it as a game-changer, with one viral post stating, “Monero’s latest upgrade makes privacy unbreakable – surveillance money just got outmatched #PrivacyCoins.” Similarly, Zcash’s official Twitter shared in October 2025 that shielded transactions hit a record high, driven by adoption in DeFi protocols. These updates underscore the momentum, with topics like “privacy coins regulation 2025” trending as governments debate bans versus integration.

Moreover, the most discussed Twitter threads revolve around privacy coins’ role in everyday finance, with users sharing stories of using them for cross-border remittances without fees or oversight. A recent poll on Twitter asked, “Do you prefer privacy coins over traceable crypto?” and 68% voted yes, citing freedom from surveillance as the top reason. These insights show a shift: people aren’t just curious; they’re actively seeking ways to reclaim financial autonomy.

Bridging History and the Future with Private Crypto

Privacy coins challenge the status quo not by rebellion, but by restoration. They’re a bridge back to when money was a tool for people, not a leash held by institutions. In an age where digital footprints define us, these assets offer empowerment. Whether you’re in a stable economy or navigating uncertainty, the ability to transact privately is a cornerstone of freedom.

Compare it to the evolution of communication: we moved from unmonitored letters to encrypted emails because privacy matters. Similarly, crypto restores that in finance. Evidence from adoption rates supports this – Monero’s usage has grown steadily, with transaction volumes reflecting real-world utility beyond speculation.

Platforms like WEEX further this by prioritizing user-centric features, such as seamless integration of privacy-focused tools. Their emphasis on security and privacy not only aligns with the ethos of these coins but also builds credibility in the broader crypto ecosystem. By offering low-fee trading and educational resources on privacy coins, WEEX empowers users to make informed choices, fostering a community where financial privacy is celebrated, not questioned.

As we wrap up, remember that the push for privacy isn’t about secrecy for its own sake. It’s about preserving the human element in money – the right to exchange value without an audience. In a world tilting toward total visibility, privacy coins stand as a reminder that some traditions are worth holding onto. They’re not the outlier; they’re the original.

FAQ

What Are Privacy Coins and How Do They Differ from Regular Cryptocurrencies?

Privacy coins like Monero and Zcash use advanced tech to hide transaction details, unlike Bitcoin where details are public on the blockchain. This makes them more like digital cash, focusing on anonymity.

Are Privacy Coins Legal and Safe to Use?

Yes, they’re legal in most places, though regulations vary. They’re safe when used on reputable platforms like WEEX, but always research and use secure wallets to minimize risks.

Why Is Surveillance Money Considered a Recent Experiment?

It started around 70 years ago with credit cards and tracking laws, shifting from thousands of years of anonymous money to systems where transactions are monitored.

How Can Privacy Coins Help in Unstable Economies?

They allow secure, private storage and transfer of value, protecting against inflation, seizures, or unstable banks, much like cash but in digital form.

What’s the Future Outlook for Privacy Coins in 2025?

With updates like Monero’s ring signatures and rising adoption, they’re gaining traction despite regulations, offering alternatives as surveillance concerns grow.

You may also like

From 0 to $1 Million: Five Steps to Outperform the Market Through Wallet Tracking

If you can grasp the system and see transactions as a byproduct of building a better life, then your chances of success will be much greater.

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook

Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more