Pantera Partner: Privacy Renaissance Era, These Technologies Are Changing the Game

By: blockbeats|2025/11/23 11:30:02
0
Share
copy
Original Article Title: Privacy Renaissance: Blockchain's Next Era
Original Article Author: Paul Veradittakit, Partner at Pantera Capital
Original Article Translation: Saoirse, Foresight News

Since the birth of Bitcoin, the core concept of the blockchain industry has always been rooted in "transparency" — it is an open and tamper-proof ledger that anyone can view; its trust comes from "validation" rather than institutional reputation. It is this transparency that allows decentralized systems to function properly based on integrity and accountability mechanisms.

However, as blockchain technology matures and its use cases continue to expand, relying solely on "transparency" is no longer sufficient. A new reality is taking shape: privacy protection is a key driver for blockchain to move towards mainstream adoption, and the demand for privacy is accelerating at the cultural, institutional, and technological levels. At Pantera Capital, we have believed in this view from the very beginning — as early as 2015, we invested in Zcash, one of the first projects to introduce privacy protection to an immutable ledger.

We believe the industry is entering the "Privacy Renaissance" era: an era that will deeply integrate the concept of open blockchain with the practical needs of global finance. In this context, privacy protocols built on the core principle of "confidentiality," such as the upcoming Zama mainnet, have seen a development opportunity. Zama's Fully Homomorphic Encryption (FHE) technology is a "fortress" driving blockchain towards mainstream applications and is also capable of defending against threats posed by quantum computing in the coming years. Blockchain applications are just one deployment area of Zama's Fully Homomorphic Encryption technology, which can also be extended to other verticals such as artificial intelligence (like Zama's Concrete platform) and cloud computing.

Another notable investment target is StarkWare — the inventor of zk-STARKs zero-knowledge proof technology and the Validium solution, providing a "hybrid solution" for blockchain privacy protection and scalability. StarkWare's encryption technology also has post-quantum properties and focuses on blockchain application scenarios, especially with its latest introduction of the "S-Two Prover," further enhancing the technology's practicality.

Cultural Shift: From "Surveillance Fatigue" to "Digital Sovereignty"

Globally, there has been a fundamental shift in people's perception of data. Years of mass surveillance, algorithmic tracking, and data breaches have made "privacy" one of the core cultural issues of the past decade. Today, users are gradually realizing that not only information and transaction records but even metadata can reveal intimate details such as personal identity, wealth, location, and relationships.

「Privacy Protection + User Ownership of Sensitive Data」 has become the new industry norm — this is also the direction favored by Pantera Capital, for which we have invested in projects like Zama, StarkWare, Transcrypts, and World. As public awareness of privacy continues to rise, the blockchain industry must face a fact: digital currencies need "confidentiality" rather than "full traceability." In such an environment, privacy is no longer a niche demand but a critical part of driving the development of "digital sovereignty."

Institutional Shift: Transparency Without Privacy Cannot Support Scalable Applications

More and more institutions are entering the blockchain ecosystem: banks, remittance platforms, payment processors, enterprises, and fintech companies are all conducting pilots, preparing to handle real transaction volumes in tokenized assets, cross-border settlements, and multi-jurisdiction payment networks.

However, these institutions cannot operate on a "completely transparent public ledger" — corporate cash flows, supplier networks, foreign exchange risk exposures, contract terms, and customer transaction records must not be disclosed to competitors or the public. What enterprises need is "selective transparency with confidentiality," not "full exposure."

This is exactly the foundation laid by early pioneer projects like Zcash. When Pantera Capital invested in Zcash in 2015, we realized that privacy is not an ideological preference but a necessary condition for actual economic activities. The core insight of Zcash is that privacy protection cannot be "retrofitted" into a system (especially when using zero-knowledge proof technology) but must be embedded in the protocol's core — otherwise, subsequent use would become extremely challenging, fragile, and inefficient.

Launched in 2016 as a Bitcoin fork project, Zcash introduced zk-SNARKs technology, which can hide transaction details while ensuring complete transaction verifiability. Additionally, the mixer protocol Tornado Cash is also a significant milestone in on-chain privacy development: as people seek ways to break the linkability of on-chain transactions, the protocol has seen a significant amount of real user activity.

Pantera Partner: Privacy Renaissance Era, These Technologies Are Changing the Game

Tornado Cash USD Inflow Change Pre and Post Sanctions (Source: TRM Labs)

However, Tornado Cash's model has flaws: it emphasizes strong privacy protection but lacks a "selective disclosure mechanism," ultimately leading to high-profile legal actions by government agencies — even though the project is autonomously operated by code, it was still forced to effectively halt. This outcome confirms a key lesson: privacy protection cannot come at the expense of "auditability" or a "compliance path."

This is also the core value of Zama's fully homomorphic encryption technology: FHE supports performing calculations directly on "encrypted data" while preserving the ability for "selective verification and disclosure of information" — a feature that protocols like Tornado Cash did not have from the outset.

The importance of fully homomorphic encryption is evident from the strategies of tech giants: companies like Apple and Microsoft are investing resources to build FHE frameworks. Their investment conveys a clear consensus: for consumers and institutions, "scalable, compliant, end-to-end encryption technology" is the future of digital privacy.

Privacy Needs Are Accelerating

Data confirms this trend: privacy-focused crypto assets are gaining more attention from users and investors. However, the real shift is not being primarily driven by retail speculation but rather by the practical application scenario where "privacy and transparency must coexist":

• Cross-border payments are increasingly relying on blockchain, but enterprises and banks cannot publicly disclose every payment route;

• RWAs need to keep "holdings" and "investor identities" confidential;

• In global supply chain finance, transaction parties need to verify events (such as shipping, invoices, settlements) without revealing trade secrets;

• Enterprise transaction networks need a mode where "auditors and regulators can see, but the public cannot."

Meanwhile, retail users are becoming increasingly dissatisfied with "high-surveillance public blockchains" — on these blockchains, a simple tool can easily reconstruct the transaction graph. Today, "privacy protection" has become one of the core expectations users have for digital currencies.

In short, the market is gradually recognizing a fact: blockchain that cannot provide confidentiality will face structural limitations in institutional-scale applications.

Canton, Zama, StarkWare, and the Next-Generation Privacy Architecture

As the era of privacy renaissance unfolds, a new generation of protocols is emerging to meet institutional needs.

Take Canton Blockchain, for example, which highlights the growing demand from enterprises for "private transaction execution on a shared settlement layer." These systems allow participants to engage in private transactions while benefiting from "global state synchronization" and "shared infrastructure" — Canton's development fully illustrates that enterprises want to harness the value of blockchain while avoiding the public exposure of business data.

However, the most revolutionary breakthrough in the field of private computing may come from Zama — it occupies a unique and more scalable position in the privacy technology stack. Zama is building a "confidential layer" based on fully homomorphic encryption (FHE), supporting calculations directly on encrypted data. This means that the entire smart contract (including inputs, state, and outputs) can remain encrypted while still being verifiable on a public blockchain.

Unlike a "Privacy-First Layer1 Public Chain," Zama is compatible with the existing ecosystem (especially the Ethereum Virtual Machine EVM) — meaning developers and institutions do not need to migrate to a new chain, they just need to integrate privacy features into their existing development environment.

Private Smart Contracts Using Fully Homomorphic Encryption (FHE) (Source: Zama)

Zama's architecture represents the next evolution of blockchain privacy protection: no longer just hiding transactions, but achieving "scalable private smart contracts." This will unlock entirely new use cases — including private DeFi, encrypted order books, confidential real-world asset issuance, institutional-grade settlement processes with secure multiparty business logic — and all scenarios do not require sacrificing decentralization, with some applications expected to go live in the short term.

Currently, private assets are receiving more attention: institutions are actively evaluating privacy layer technology, developers hope to achieve privacy computing without "off-chain system latency and complexity," regulators are also starting to develop frameworks to distinguish between "legitimate privacy tools" and "illegal obfuscation techniques."

Looking to the Future

The privacy narrative in the blockchain industry is no longer about the "opposition between transparency and confidentiality" but about realizing that both are necessary conditions for the next era of DeFi. The overlap of cultural attitudes, institutional needs, and cryptographic breakthroughs is reshaping the direction of blockchain's evolution over the next decade.

Zcash has proven the necessity of privacy protection at the protocol level; protocols like Canton embody institutional demand for a "confidential transaction network"; and Zama is building infrastructure that is expected to integrate these requirements into a "cross-chain universal scalable privacy layer."

Pantera Capital's early investment in Zcash was based on a simple belief: privacy protection is not an "optional." Nearly a decade later, the relevance of this view is becoming increasingly apparent — from tokenized assets to cross-border payments, and enterprise settlements, the key to the next wave of blockchain application landing lies in achieving a "secure, seamless, private" technological experience.

As privacy protection becomes the core theme of this market cycle, protocols that can provide "practical, scalable, compliant confidential solutions" will define the industry's future landscape. Among them, Zama, as a leader with high potential and timeliness in the "Privacy Super Cycle," is standing out.

Original Article Link

You may also like

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook

Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Wall Street's Hottest Trades See Exodus

This time there is no single triggering factor, but rather market anxiety about asset valuation, with many already skeptical of these valuations being too high, leading to investors choosing to retreat almost simultaneously.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more