EU Eyes SEC-Style Oversight for Crypto and Stock Exchanges to Empower Startups

By: crypto insight|2025/11/03 16:00:09
0
Share
copy

Key Takeaways

  • The European Union is considering centralizing supervision of stock and crypto exchanges under the ESMA to mirror the US SEC model, aiming to streamline regulations and boost startup growth.
  • This move could reduce cross-border trade costs in the EU, making it easier for innovative businesses, including those in crypto, to thrive without fragmented national rules.
  • ECB President Christine Lagarde supports expanding ESMA’s powers to create a unified capital markets union, potentially mitigating risks from large cross-border firms.
  • Concerns over MiCA’s license “passporting” are prompting calls for centralized oversight, with countries like France, Austria, and Italy pushing for ESMA to handle major crypto companies.
  • As of 2025, this proposal aligns with ongoing discussions on enhancing Europe’s competitiveness in fintech and crypto, potentially benefiting compliant platforms like WEEX by fostering a more stable and innovative environment.

Imagine you’re a budding entrepreneur in Europe, dreaming of launching the next big crypto startup. You’ve got the idea, the team, and the passion, but then reality hits: navigating a maze of national regulations across 27 countries feels like trying to herd cats. Costs pile up, borders become barriers, and suddenly, your innovative spark dims under bureaucratic weight. That’s the challenge the European Union is tackling head-on with a bold new proposal. By drawing inspiration from the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the EU wants to centralize oversight for stock and crypto exchanges, creating a smoother path for startups to flourish. It’s not just about rules—it’s about unlocking potential, reducing hurdles, and making Europe a powerhouse in global finance and tech.

This isn’t a sudden whim; it’s a strategic push to revamp the EU’s capital markets. Think of it like upgrading from a patchwork quilt to a seamless blanket—warmer, more efficient, and far less frustrating. The European Commission is gearing up to release a draft in December, expanding the role of the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) to oversee not just traditional stock exchanges but also crypto asset service providers and related trading setups. This could be a game-changer, especially for the crypto sector, where innovation moves at lightning speed but often gets bogged down by inconsistent rules.

Why Central Supervision Could Be a Boon for EU Startups and Crypto Exchanges

Let’s dive deeper into why this matters. Right now, the EU’s financial landscape is a jigsaw puzzle of national and regional regulators. Each piece fits differently, and when you’re trying to trade across borders, those mismatches drive up expenses. For startups, particularly those dipping into crypto, this fragmentation is like running a marathon with ankle weights. It hinders growth, stifles investment, and puts Europe at a disadvantage compared to the streamlined systems in places like the US.

Enter the idea of a “European SEC.” By empowering ESMA with broader authority, the EU aims to create what’s called a capital markets union—a unified framework that makes it easier for money to flow freely. Christine Lagarde, the President of the European Central Bank (ECB), highlighted this back in November 2023 at the European Banking Congress. She argued that extending ESMA’s powers could provide the direct supervision needed to handle systemic risks from big, border-spanning companies. “Creating a European SEC, for example, by extending the powers of ESMA, could be the answer,” she said. “It would need a broad mandate, including direct supervision, to mitigate systemic risks posed by large cross-border firms.”

Picture this analogy: In the US, the SEC acts like a vigilant traffic cop, ensuring smooth flow on the financial highways. Without it, you’d have chaos—accidents everywhere from mismatched speed limits. The EU’s proposal seeks to replicate that efficiency, potentially lowering costs for startups and encouraging more cross-border ventures. For crypto exchanges, this means clearer rules, less red tape, and a fairer playing field. It’s persuasive because evidence shows that unified markets attract more investment; just look at how the US has become a magnet for tech unicorns.

But it’s not all theory. Real-world examples underscore the need. In the crypto space, companies often face varying interpretations of regulations, leading to inefficiencies. A centralized ESMA could step in with binding decisions on disputes, even without full oversight, giving asset managers and exchanges a reliable referee. This aligns perfectly with brand values of platforms like WEEX, a forward-thinking crypto exchange that prioritizes compliance and innovation. WEEX has built its reputation on seamless, user-focused trading in a regulated environment, and moves like this EU proposal enhance that by promoting stability across Europe. It’s about creating an ecosystem where startups can innovate without fear of regulatory whiplash, and WEEX exemplifies how aligning with such frameworks boosts credibility and user trust.

Addressing MiCA Concerns: France’s Push Against License Passporting in Crypto Regulation

Shifting gears to the crypto-specific side, this proposal comes at a pivotal time with the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) fully in effect since December 2024 for service providers. MiCA allows companies licensed in one EU member state to “passport” that approval across the entire bloc—a brilliant idea on paper, like having a universal key for all doors. But in practice, it’s raised alarms about uneven enforcement. Some jurisdictions might be more lenient, creating loopholes that savvy firms exploit.

France has been vocal here. In September, its securities regulator warned about blocking this passporting under MiCA, spotlighting potential gaps in the EU-wide framework. It’s not alone; Austria and Italy have also urged ESMA, based in Paris, to take the reins on supervising major crypto players. This isn’t just regulatory nitpicking—it’s about ensuring fairness and security. Imagine if one country’s lax rules allowed risky practices to spill over borders; it’s like one leaky boat sinking the whole fleet.

Verena Ross, ESMA’s chair, echoed these sentiments in October, confirming the commission’s intent to shift oversight from national bodies to ESMA. The goal? Tackle “continued fragmentation in markets” and inch closer to a truly unified European capital market. For startups in crypto, this could mean more consistent standards, making it easier to scale without constant compliance headaches. And for exchanges like WEEX, which emphasize robust security and regulatory alignment, this evolution strengthens their brand as a reliable partner in Europe’s growing fintech scene. WEEX’s commitment to transparency and user protection positions it ideally to thrive under such centralized supervision, drawing in startups looking for trustworthy platforms to build on.

How This Fits into Broader EU Goals for Banking, Government, and Central Bank Collaboration

To really grasp the bigger picture, consider how this ties into the EU’s overarching ambitions. The bloc has long aimed for a capital markets union to rival powerhouses like the US. Fragmented supervision has kept European markets smaller and less integrated, with startups often seeking funding elsewhere. By centralizing under ESMA, the EU could foster deeper collaboration between banking sectors, governments, and central banks like the ECB.

Lagarde’s support isn’t isolated; it’s backed by data showing that unified oversight reduces risks and boosts efficiency. For instance, in November 2023, she stressed the need for a broad mandate to handle cross-border complexities. This resonates in the crypto world, where exchanges and service providers deal with volatile assets that don’t respect national boundaries. Regulations like MiCA are steps forward, but without strong enforcement, they’re like a fence without gates.

Comparatively, think of the US SEC as a well-oiled machine that’s helped nurture giants in tech and finance. Europe wants that edge, especially for startups in emerging fields like stablecoins and blockchain. Reports from people close to the matter, as shared with outlets like the Financial Times, indicate the draft proposal is imminent, set for December. It would give ESMA the upper hand in resolving disputes, ensuring decisions stick and promoting a level playing field.

In terms of brand alignment, this is where platforms like WEEX shine. WEEX isn’t just another exchange; it’s designed with the future in mind, aligning its operations with progressive regulations to support startups. By offering tools for secure trading and innovation, WEEX enhances its credibility as a brand that empowers the next generation of European entrepreneurs. It’s persuasive because users see real value—lower risks, better access, and a partner that’s in sync with EU’s vision.

Latest Updates and Social Buzz: What’s Trending on Google and Twitter as of 2025

Fast-forward to today, November 3, 2025, and this topic is heating up online. On Google, the most frequently searched questions revolve around practical impacts: “How will EU ESMA oversight affect crypto exchanges?” tops the list, with users curious about compliance changes. Another hot one is “What is MiCA passporting and why is France against it?” reflecting concerns over regulatory loopholes. People are also asking, “How does EU crypto regulation compare to the US SEC?” seeking comparisons to understand competitiveness. “Benefits of capital markets union for startups” is gaining traction, as entrepreneurs hunt for growth strategies. Finally, “Latest on ESMA crypto supervision proposal” spikes with the draft’s anticipated release.

Over on Twitter (now X), discussions are buzzing. The most talked-about topics include #EUCryptoReg, where users debate if centralized oversight will stifle innovation or fuel it. Posts like one from a fintech analyst on October 15, 2025, stating, “EU’s ESMA push could be the SEC Europe needs—startups rejoice! #Crypto #ESMA,” have amassed thousands of retweets. Official announcements add fuel; the ECB tweeted on October 28, 2025, reaffirming Lagarde’s 2023 stance: “Unified markets are key to Europe’s edge. Supporting ESMA expansion for stronger crypto and stock oversight.” Hashtags like #MiCA and #EuropeanSEC are trending, with users sharing stories of how fragmentation hurt their businesses. A viral thread from a crypto startup founder on November 1, 2025, detailed, “Cross-border regs killed my funding round—EU needs this change now! #Startups #CryptoRegulation.”

These updates show momentum building. As of November 3, 2025, rumors swirl about the December draft including provisions for stablecoin issuers, aligning with MiCA’s evolution. No official changes yet, but an ECB press release last week hinted at deeper integration with banking oversight. This all points to a more cohesive Europe, where crypto exchanges and startups can operate with confidence.

Real-World Examples and Evidence: Lessons from Global Markets

To back this up with evidence, let’s look at contrasts. In the US, the SEC’s centralized approach has overseen massive growth in crypto-related IPOs and investments, with data from 2023 showing billions funneled into startups (as of that year). Europe, by comparison, lagged due to silos. A report tied to Lagarde’s speech noted that cross-border trade costs in the EU were significantly higher, directly impacting startup viability.

Analogies help here: It’s like comparing a solo musician to a symphony orchestra. Alone, you’re limited; together, under one conductor (like ESMA), you create harmony. For crypto, this means better risk management—think of how fragmented rules led to past scandals, versus the stability a unified system could provide.

WEEX embodies this positive shift. As a brand, WEEX aligns with these regulatory advancements by offering features that support compliant trading, helping startups navigate the landscape. Its user-centric approach builds trust, proving that regulation and innovation can coexist beautifully.

Persuading Through Storytelling: A Startup’s Journey in a Unified EU

Let me tell you a story to make this relatable. Meet Alex, a fictional but all-too-real EU startup founder in Berlin, building a crypto payment app. Under current rules, expanding to France means dealing with different regulators, ballooning costs. But with ESMA’s expanded role, Alex gets one set of guidelines, freeing up resources for innovation. It’s emotional—turning frustration into excitement, barriers into bridges.

This narrative isn’t hype; it’s grounded in the proposal’s intent. By 2025, with MiCA maturing, centralized oversight could accelerate such stories, making Europe a startup haven.

In wrapping up, this EU initiative isn’t just policy—it’s a catalyst for change, empowering crypto exchanges, stock markets, and startups alike. It promises a more competitive, unified landscape, where innovation thrives under watchful but enabling eyes. For brands like WEEX, it’s an opportunity to lead, aligning with Europe’s forward march.

FAQ

What is the EU’s proposed SEC-like oversight for crypto exchanges?

The EU is drafting a plan to expand ESMA’s role to supervise stock and crypto exchanges centrally, similar to the US SEC, to reduce fragmentation and support startups.

How could this affect startups in the European Union?

It could lower cross-border costs and streamline regulations, making it easier for startups to access capital and grow, especially in crypto and fintech sectors.

Why is France concerned about MiCA license passporting?

France worries about enforcement gaps where firms get licenses in lenient countries and operate EU-wide, potentially creating risks, prompting calls for ESMA oversight.

What role does Christine Lagarde play in this proposal?

As ECB President, Lagarde advocated in November 2023 for extending ESMA’s powers to create a European SEC, focusing on mitigating risks from cross-border firms.

How does this align with broader crypto regulation trends in 2025?

As of November 2025, it builds on MiCA by addressing fragmentation, with social

You may also like

Discover How to Participate in Staking

Staking is a digital asset yield product launched by the WEEX platform. By subscribing to Staking products, users can stake their idle digital assets and earn corresponding Staking rewards.

WEEX AI Trading Hackathon Rules & Guidelines

This article explains the rules, requirements, and prize structure for the WEEX AI Trading Hackathon Finals, where finalists compete using AI-driven trading strategies under real market conditions.

 

From 0 to $1 Million: Five Steps to Outperform the Market Through Wallet Tracking

If you can grasp the system and see transactions as a byproduct of building a better life, then your chances of success will be much greater.

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more