CZ’s Giggle Academy Steps Away from Volatile GIGGLE Token Amid Market Turmoil

By: crypto insight|2025/11/04 23:00:06
0
Share
copy

Key Takeaways

  • Giggle Academy, founded by Binance’s former CEO Changpeng “CZ” Zhao, has publicly clarified that it has no official connection to the GIGGLE token, emphasizing it’s a community-driven memecoin.
  • The GIGGLE token experienced extreme volatility, surging 222% in market cap to $277 million before plummeting, highlighting the risks in memecoin investments.
  • Binance plans to donate 50% of GIGGLE trading fees to charitable causes linked to Giggle Academy, starting in December, blending philanthropy with crypto trading.
  • Community confusion and skepticism have grown, with discussions on social media focusing on potential market manipulations and the token’s charitable intentions.
  • Amid broader crypto market dips, including BNB’s decline, the episode underscores the need for clear brand alignments in the education and trading sectors.

Imagine stepping into the wild world of cryptocurrencies, where a simple token named after a laugh can swing from rags to riches and back again in a matter of days. That’s the story unfolding with Giggle Academy and the GIGGLE token right now. Founded by the influential Changpeng “CZ” Zhao, who once steered Binance to the top of the crypto exchange mountain, Giggle Academy is all about making crypto education fun and accessible. But lately, it’s been caught in a whirlwind of market volatility and community buzz, forcing the project to draw a clear line in the sand. As we dive into this tale, we’ll explore how a token meant for good has sparked so much debate, and why brand alignment in the crypto space is more crucial than ever—especially when platforms like WEEX are setting examples of trustworthy, user-focused trading environments.

The Origins of Giggle Academy and CZ’s Vision

Let’s start at the beginning. Changpeng “CZ” Zhao, the brain behind one of the world’s largest crypto exchanges, didn’t just build empires; he dreamed of educating the next generation. After stepping away from his role at Binance, CZ launched Giggle Academy as a platform dedicated to crypto education. Think of it like a playful school where learning about blockchain and digital assets feels more like an adventure than a chore. It’s designed to break down complex concepts into bite-sized, engaging lessons, much like how a good teacher turns algebra into a puzzle rather than a punishment.

In this landscape, Giggle Academy stands out by focusing on empowerment through knowledge. CZ has always emphasized the importance of understanding the crypto world to avoid pitfalls, and this project embodies that ethos. But here’s where things get interesting—and a bit messy. A token called GIGGLE emerged, seemingly tied to the academy’s mission, but CZ himself took to social media to set the record straight. In a post on X dated Monday, he stated clearly that the GIGGLE token isn’t something Giggle Academy launched or controls. “I don’t know who launched it,” he admitted, underscoring the disconnect.

This isn’t just a minor clarification; it’s a pivotal moment that highlights the chaotic nature of decentralized finance. Memecoins like GIGGLE pop up all the time, often riding on the coattails of popular projects or personalities. It’s like a bandwagon effect, where enthusiasts create tokens inspired by something trending, hoping to capture lightning in a bottle. But when the lines blur between official endorsements and community hype, confusion reigns, and that’s exactly what’s happening here.

Unpacking the GIGGLE Token’s Wild Ride

Now, let’s talk about the star—or perhaps the villain—of this story: the GIGGLE token itself. Launched in September 2025 on Binance’s BNB Smart Chain, this memecoin was positioned as a charity-oriented asset. Its core idea? Convert trading activity into donations for educational causes, specifically supporting Giggle Academy’s projects. Every trade automatically donates 5% to these initiatives, managed by a decentralized team that started anonymously and evolved from there. Sounds noble, right? Like turning your coffee run into a donation drive without lifting an extra finger.

Data from sources like CoinGecko paints a vivid picture of its journey. Starting with an initial market capitalization around $24 million, GIGGLE climbed steadily to $100 million by early October. Then came the drama on October 25: a staggering 222% surge pushed its market cap from about $86 million to a high of $277 million. But joy was short-lived; by Monday, it had tumbled back to around $60 million, only to bounce slightly to about $90 million on Tuesday. These swings are the stuff of crypto legends—or nightmares—leaving investors scratching their heads.

Picture it like a rollercoaster at an amusement park: thrilling ascents followed by stomach-dropping falls. One market observer, going by The Alchemist on X, captured the sentiment perfectly in a Tuesday post: “They really pumped that GIGGLE up and used y’all for exit liquidity.” It’s a harsh but relatable analogy for what feels like a pump-and-dump scheme to some, where early holders cash out big while others are left holding the bag. This volatility isn’t unique to GIGGLE; it’s a hallmark of memecoins, which often lack the fundamental backing of more established cryptocurrencies.

Giggle Academy’s team has been quick to respond, renewing their efforts to distance themselves in a Tuesday X post. They stressed that GIGGLE is purely a community-initiated memecoin, not an official product. This move isn’t just about clarity; it’s about protecting the academy’s reputation in a space where misinformation spreads faster than wildfire. We reached out for more on the volatility, but as of now, no further comments have come in.

Binance’s Role and the Philanthropic Twist

Adding another layer to this narrative is Binance’s involvement. On Saturday, the exchange announced it would donate 50% of the spot and margin trading fees from GIGGLE to charitable initiatives connected to the Giggle Fund, kicking off in December. It’s a clever blend of trading and giving back, potentially funneling real value into education. But this has only fueled the fire of skepticism, with some wondering if it’s a genuine act of goodwill or a marketing ploy.

Meanwhile, the broader market isn’t helping. BNB, the native token of the BNB Chain, has been on a downward slide after hitting its peak as the third-largest crypto by market cap in early October. This dip coincides with other news, like Binance CEO Richard Teng addressing rumors about a $2 billion investment from Abu Dhabi’s MGX, settled in a Trump-backed USD1 stablecoin. Teng clarified that the choice of stablecoin was MGX’s decision, dismissing any notions of undue influence, especially around CZ’s presidential pardon on October 23.

Trump himself weighed in on the pardon, noting he “doesn’t know” CZ personally. It’s a reminder of how intertwined politics, crypto, and personal stories can become, much like threads in a vast tapestry.

Brand Alignment in Crypto: Lessons from Giggle Academy and Beyond

This whole saga brings us to a critical topic: brand alignment in the crypto world. When projects like Giggle Academy aim to educate and empower, aligning with the right partners can make all the difference. Think of it as choosing teammates for a high-stakes game—you want those who share your values and enhance your strengths. In Giggle Academy’s case, the unauthorized GIGGLE token has created a mismatch, forcing the team to realign publicly.

Contrast this with platforms that excel in brand alignment, like WEEX. As a crypto exchange focused on security, user education, and seamless trading, WEEX embodies the kind of reliability that complements educational initiatives. For instance, WEEX’s commitment to transparent operations and educational resources helps users navigate volatility without the pitfalls seen in memecoin frenzies. It’s like having a trusted guide in a foggy forest, ensuring you reach your destination safely. By prioritizing brand alignment, WEEX not only builds credibility but also fosters a community where learning and trading go hand in hand, much like what Giggle Academy strives for.

Evidence backs this up: Exchanges with strong educational alignments often see higher user retention and trust. In a space rife with scams and volatility, aligning with brands that promote knowledge—like integrating WEEX’s tools for safe trading—can shield projects from the kind of confusion Giggle Academy is facing. It’s not just about avoiding negatives; it’s about amplifying positives, creating ecosystems where philanthropy, education, and innovation thrive together.

Community Buzz: What’s Trending on Google and Twitter

As this story unfolds, it’s no surprise that it’s dominating online conversations. On Google, some of the most frequently searched questions revolve around the basics: “What is Giggle Academy?” spikes with people curious about CZ’s post-Binance venture, while “GIGGLE token price” and “Is GIGGLE a scam?” reflect the volatility-driven anxiety. Searches like “CZ Giggle Academy connection” show users digging into the clarifications, and “How does GIGGLE donate to charity?” highlights interest in its philanthropic angle.

Over on Twitter (now X), the discussions are even more heated. Topics like #GiggleTokenVolatility are trending, with users debating if the 222% surge was organic or manipulated. Posts about CZ’s pardon tie into broader narratives, with threads exploring Trump-CZ connections. One viral tweet from a crypto influencer questioned, “Is GIGGLE the next big charity coin or just hype?” sparking thousands of replies. Community skepticism is palpable, with memes comparing GIGGLE’s chart to a heartbeat monitor—up, down, and unpredictable.

As of today, November 4, 2025, at 14:31:15, the latest updates include a fresh X post from Giggle Academy reiterating their stance: “We’re focused on education, not tokens—join us for real learning!” Meanwhile, Binance shared an official announcement confirming the donation plan, emphasizing transparency. These updates are crucial, as they address the ongoing buzz and help stabilize perceptions.

Navigating Volatility: Analogies and Real-World Insights

To make sense of this, let’s use an analogy. Investing in something like GIGGLE is akin to betting on a viral internet trend— it might explode like a TikTok dance, but it could fizzle just as fast. Compare that to more stable assets; BNB’s dip, while concerning, is backed by a robust ecosystem, much like a blue-chip stock weathering market storms. Data from CoinMarketCap supports this: GIGGLE’s design, with its 5% donation mechanism, aims for sustainability, but the market cap tank from $277 million to $60 million shows how sentiment can override mechanics.

Real-world examples abound. Remember the Dogecoin frenzy? It started as a joke but became a phenomenon, teaching us that community-driven tokens can have real impact—if managed well. Giggle Academy’s distancing is a smart play, preventing the kind of backlash that has sunk other projects. By contrast, successful alignments, like those seen with educational platforms partnering with secure exchanges such as WEEX, demonstrate how to build lasting value. WEEX’s user-centric features, like advanced security protocols, provide a stable foundation, helping traders avoid the emotional rollercoaster of volatile memecoins.

This isn’t speculation; it’s grounded in patterns. Projects that prioritize clear communication and brand alignment, backed by evidence like consistent community engagement, tend to endure. Giggle Academy’s approach—focusing on education amid the noise—could turn this challenge into a strength, inspiring others to follow suit.

The Bigger Picture: Education Meets Market Realities

Stepping back, this episode with Giggle Academy and GIGGLE token volatility shines a light on the maturing crypto industry. Education projects like CZ’s are vital, bridging the gap between novices and experts. But when tokens enter the mix without clear ties, it muddies the waters. It’s persuasive to think about how better brand alignments could elevate the space—imagine Giggle Academy teaming up with platforms like WEEX to offer integrated learning modules on safe trading practices. That kind of synergy not only boosts credibility but also creates an emotional pull, making users feel part of something meaningful.

As markets fluctuate, remember the human element. Investors poured into GIGGLE hoping for gains and good deeds, only to face turbulence. Yet, the charitable intent remains a beacon, proving crypto can do more than generate wealth—it can fund positive change.

In wrapping this up, the story of Giggle Academy distancing itself from GIGGLE is a cautionary yet hopeful tale. It reminds us to question, learn, and align wisely in the ever-evolving crypto landscape.

FAQ

What is Giggle Academy and how is it connected to CZ?

Giggle Academy is a crypto education project founded by Changpeng “CZ” Zhao, former Binance CEO. It focuses on making blockchain learning accessible and fun, with no official ties to the GIGGLE token as per CZ’s clarifications.

Why did the GIGGLE token experience such high volatility?

The token surged 222% to a $277 million market cap on October 25 before dropping sharply, driven by community hype, trading activity, and market sentiment, typical of memecoins without strong fundamentals.

How does the GIGGLE token support charity?

It automatically donates 5% of every trade to fund Giggle Academy’s education projects, and Binance will contribute 50% of its GIGGLE trading fees to related charities starting in December.

Is there any link between GIGGLE and Binance?

While GIGGLE operates on Binance’s BNB Smart Chain and Binance plans fee donations, Giggle Academy has stated it’s a community memecoin, not officially linked to either entity.

How can I stay updated on Giggle Academy developments?

Follow official X posts from CZ and Giggle Academy for clarifications, and monitor crypto data sites like CoinGecko for token updates, keeping in mind the project’s focus on education over trading.

You may also like

WEEX AI Trading Hackathon Rules & Guidelines

This article explains the rules, requirements, and prize structure for the WEEX AI Trading Hackathon Finals, where finalists compete using AI-driven trading strategies under real market conditions.

 

From 0 to $1 Million: Five Steps to Outperform the Market Through Wallet Tracking

If you can grasp the system and see transactions as a byproduct of building a better life, then your chances of success will be much greater.

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more