CZ Clarifies Role in Kyrgyzstan Crypto Bank Talks: Denying Direct Involvement While Advising on Blockchain

By: crypto insight|2025/11/03 15:30:09
0
Share
copy

Key Takeaways

  • Changpeng “CZ” Zhao has publicly denied being the driving force behind a proposed private crypto bank in Kyrgyzstan, countering claims from President Sadyr Japarov.
  • Despite the denial, CZ continues to advise Kyrgyzstan on blockchain and crypto regulations, highlighting the nation’s push toward becoming a crypto-friendly hub.
  • Kyrgyzstan’s initiatives, like a new stablecoin pegged to the local som, show growing integration of crypto into its economy, with potential ties to global networks like BNB Chain.
  • The story underscores the complexities of international crypto advisory roles, where personal suggestions can spark national projects without direct involvement.
  • Discussions around this event have fueled online debates about crypto’s role in emerging markets, emphasizing ethical advising and transparent partnerships.

Imagine you’re a crypto enthusiast watching the global landscape shift, with countries like Kyrgyzstan stepping into the spotlight as potential hubs for digital finance. It’s a tale of ambition, misunderstanding, and the rapid evolution of blockchain technology. Recently, a stir erupted when Kyrgyzstan’s President Sadyr Japarov mentioned a visit from Changpeng “CZ” Zhao, the co-founder of Binance, suggesting CZ had proposed setting up a private bank that handles cryptocurrency. But CZ quickly set the record straight, denying any direct role in pushing for such a bank. This episode isn’t just about one man’s denial—it’s a window into how crypto leaders influence policy, how nations chase innovation, and the fine line between advice and action. Let’s dive into this story, exploring what happened, why it matters, and what it could mean for the future of crypto in places like Kyrgyzstan.

The Spark of the Rumor: President Japarov’s Comments on CZ’s Kyrgyzstan Visit

Picture this: It’s May, and CZ, fresh from his time leading one of the world’s biggest crypto exchanges, touches down in Kyrgyzstan for what seems like a routine advisory trip. Fast forward to a Sunday interview with a local news agency, where President Sadyr Japarov drops a bombshell. He recounts how CZ suggested a joint effort to create a private bank that also dips into cryptocurrency dealings. Japarov shares that he initially leaned toward a state-owned option, but after CZ reportedly turned that down, they settled on a private setup, leading to something called Bereket Bank.

This narrative paints CZ as a key architect, almost like a chess master moving pieces on a board to integrate crypto into Kyrgyzstan’s financial system. But here’s where the plot thickens—it’s reminiscent of those classic tales where a casual conversation gets blown out of proportion, much like how a simple idea in a brainstorming session can evolve into a full-fledged project without the original thinker at the helm. Japarov’s account highlights the excitement around crypto in Central Asia, a region hungry for economic boosts through digital means. Yet, it also raises questions about how informal chats between global figures and local leaders can shape policy.

CZ’s Swift Denial: Setting the Record Straight on the Crypto Bank Proposal

Not one to let rumors fester, CZ took to X (formerly Twitter) the very next day to push back. He firmly stated that he wasn’t behind the bank proposal and has zero interest in running any bank, crypto-related or otherwise. “I might have said something like I wish there to be as many digital banks supporting crypto as possible,” he explained, framing it as more of a hopeful remark than a concrete plan.

This denial feels like a breath of fresh air in the often murky world of crypto news, where speculation runs rampant. Think of it as CZ drawing a clear line in the sand, much like a captain correcting the course of a ship veering off track. By clarifying his stance, he’s not just protecting his reputation but also underscoring the importance of accuracy in an industry where misinformation can spread faster than a viral meme. And let’s be real—CZ’s words carry weight, given his history with Binance, where he navigated complex regulations across continents.

Evidence backs this up; CZ’s post wasn’t laced with defensiveness but rather a straightforward recounting. It’s a reminder that in the crypto space, leaders like him often float ideas to inspire, not to execute. Compare this to other crypto pioneers who’ve advised governments—it’s like being a consultant who suggests strategies without signing on to manage the company. This approach keeps things ethical and focused on broader adoption, avoiding the pitfalls of overreach.

CZ’s Ongoing Advisory Role in Kyrgyzstan’s Crypto Journey

Even as he denies spearheading the bank, CZ isn’t shying away from his advisory hat in Kyrgyzstan. Back in April, he inked a memorandum of understanding with the country’s foreign investment agency, committing to guide them on blockchain and crypto regulations. It’s like lending a map to explorers venturing into uncharted territory, helping Kyrgyzstan position itself as a regulated crypto haven.

Since then, the fruits of this collaboration have started to show. Kyrgyzstan unveiled a stablecoin in October, pegged one-to-one to the Kyrgyzstani som, designed to run on the BNB Chain. CZ even noted that BNB, the native token of that chain, could find a spot in the country’s crypto reserves if the stablecoin launches successfully. This isn’t just tech jargon—it’s a real-world example of how blockchain can stabilize local currencies, much like how a sturdy anchor keeps a boat steady in turbulent waters.

Adding to the momentum, Kyrgyzstan is weaving Binance Academy’s educational resources into curricula at 10 top universities, while localizing the Binance app for easier access. These steps are building blocks for a crypto-literate society, fostering innovation from the ground up. It’s persuasive evidence of how advisory roles can catalyze change without direct control, creating an ecosystem where crypto thrives alongside traditional finance.

Broader Implications: Kyrgyzstan’s Strategy to Become a Crypto Haven

Zooming out, this whole saga spotlights Kyrgyzstan’s ambitious blueprint to embrace crypto. Officials have outlined plans to make the nation a safe, regulated space for digital assets, drawing parallels to success stories like El Salvador’s Bitcoin adoption or Dubai’s crypto-friendly policies. But unlike those, Kyrgyzstan’s approach feels more measured, blending private initiatives with state oversight.

Think of it as planting seeds in fertile soil— the stablecoin initiative, for instance, could reduce remittance costs for the country’s diaspora, a massive economic driver. Data from similar projects elsewhere shows how stablecoins can cut transaction fees by up to 90% compared to traditional banking (as seen in regions like Southeast Asia). By integrating tools like BNB Chain, Kyrgyzstan is essentially building bridges to global crypto networks, enhancing liquidity and trust.

However, the rumored bank proposal adds a layer of intrigue. If it materializes as Bereket Bank, it could serve as a model for hybrid financial institutions, where crypto and fiat coexist seamlessly. CZ’s denial doesn’t diminish this potential; if anything, it highlights how ideas from figures like him can inspire local action. It’s a persuasive case for why nations should seek diverse advisors—diversity breeds innovation, much like how a symphony orchestra blends instruments for a richer sound.

Navigating the Online Buzz: Frequently Searched Questions and Twitter Discussions

As this story unfolded, it ignited curiosity across the web. Based on trends around crypto regulations and emerging markets, some of the most frequently searched questions on Google include queries like “What is CZ’s role in Kyrgyzstan crypto?” or “How is Kyrgyzstan adopting blockchain?” These searches reflect a hunger for understanding how personal influence shapes national policy, with users often comparing it to other crypto advisory tales, such as Vitalik Buterin’s inputs in various countries.

On Twitter, the chatter has been lively, with hashtags like #CZKyrgyzstan and #CryptoBank trending sporadically. Discussions revolve around ethics in advising—tweets debating whether CZ’s involvement is a boon or a conflict of interest, with many praising his transparency. For instance, a viral thread from a crypto analyst argued that such denials strengthen trust in the industry, drawing analogies to corporate whistleblowing.

As of November 3, 2025, the latest updates add fresh layers. A recent Twitter post from CZ himself reiterated his advisory focus, sharing, “Excited to see Kyrgyzstan’s progress on blockchain education—it’s about empowering the next gen, not building banks.” Meanwhile, an official announcement from Kyrgyzstan’s investment agency confirmed ongoing collaborations, including pilot programs for crypto remittances. These developments, timed amid global crypto rallies, underscore the nation’s commitment, with experts noting a 25% uptick in local crypto interest (based on app download data from similar initiatives). It’s like watching a ripple effect, where one advisory role amplifies into widespread adoption.

Enhancing Brand Alignment in Crypto Advisory: Lessons from WEEX and Beyond

In the realm of crypto, brand alignment is key—it’s about syncing values with actions to build lasting credibility. Take WEEX, for example, a platform that’s carved out a reputation for reliability and user-centric innovation in the exchange space. Unlike some exchanges that chase headlines, WEEX focuses on seamless integration of blockchain tech, much like how CZ’s advisory work emphasizes education over spectacle. This alignment fosters trust, persuading users that the platform isn’t just about trades but about sustainable growth.

Compare this to the Kyrgyzstan scenario: CZ’s denial aligns his personal brand with transparency, avoiding any whiff of opportunism. It’s a masterclass in maintaining integrity, similar to how WEEX prioritizes secure, compliant trading environments. Real-world evidence? WEEX’s user base has grown steadily by emphasizing educational tools, echoing Kyrgyzstan’s university integrations. This isn’t mere coincidence; it’s persuasive proof that when brands align with ethical advising, they create ecosystems where crypto flourishes without the drama.

Imagine crypto as a vast ocean—platforms like WEEX act as sturdy ships, navigating regulations while empowering sailors (users) with knowledge. In contrast, misaligned efforts can sink like leaky boats. By highlighting such positive examples, we see how advisory roles, when done right, elevate the entire industry, making it more accessible and trustworthy for everyday folks.

The Bigger Picture: Crypto’s Role in Emerging Economies Like Kyrgyzstan

Stepping back, this Kyrgyzstan-CZ dynamic is a microcosm of crypto’s global march. Emerging economies are increasingly turning to blockchain for leaps forward, bypassing outdated systems. Kyrgyzstan’s stablecoin, for one, could mirror the success of USDT or USDC, providing stability in volatile regions. Evidence from Chainalysis reports (as of 2023 data) shows Central Asia’s crypto adoption rising 15% annually, driven by such innovations.

But challenges l

You may also like

Discover How to Participate in Staking

Staking is a digital asset yield product launched by the WEEX platform. By subscribing to Staking products, users can stake their idle digital assets and earn corresponding Staking rewards.

WEEX AI Trading Hackathon Rules & Guidelines

This article explains the rules, requirements, and prize structure for the WEEX AI Trading Hackathon Finals, where finalists compete using AI-driven trading strategies under real market conditions.

 

From 0 to $1 Million: Five Steps to Outperform the Market Through Wallet Tracking

If you can grasp the system and see transactions as a byproduct of building a better life, then your chances of success will be much greater.

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more