Bitcoin Price Fills CME Gap: Whale Selling Halts $104K Rebound as Market Eyes New Opportunities

By: crypto insight|2025/11/12 18:00:05
0
Share
copy

Key Takeaways

  • Bitcoin filled its CME weekend futures gap at $104,000 but failed to mount a sustained rebound due to strong whale selling activity.
  • A significant $240 million market dump from large holders pressured prices lower, with most major sell-offs not coming from the largest so-called “Brown Mega Whales.”
  • Open interest in Bitcoin derivatives dropped over 11% in a week, signaling a shift toward risk aversion and potential for market stabilization.
  • Market experts see short-term volatility but emphasize that current deleveraging may open strong buying opportunities for long-term investors.
  • Market sentiment and online discussions point to divided opinions, with support levels near and below $100,000 coming into sharper focus.

Understanding the Bitcoin CME Gap: Core Concepts and Market Implications

As the digital asset landscape matures, certain dynamics within the market have become almost ritualistic to investors and traders. One such phenomenon, the filling of futures “gaps” on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME), once again took center stage as Bitcoin’s price action delivered a textbook demonstration of market psychology and trading mechanics.

When Bitcoin’s price surged to new November highs near $107,500, optimism swept across the crypto community. However, this bullish sentiment met fierce resistance, as the price sharply reversed and homed in on the $104,000 level—an area corresponding with a weekend gap in Bitcoin’s CME futures chart. This pattern, familiar to seasoned market watchers, underscores the symbiotic relationship between retail and institutional strategies within digital currency markets.

The notion of “gap filling” originates from the temporary disconnects in charted prices that occur when futures markets close over the weekend, but global spot markets—operating continuously—push prices to new levels. Upon resumption of futures trading, prices tend to move quickly to bridge the discrepancy. Traders often compare this activity to water always seeking its lowest level in a stream: the market gravitates toward these gaps with remarkable consistency, perpetuating a self-fulfilling prophecy as participants anticipate and react to the movement.

Whale Activity and Market Reaction: Anatomy of a $240 Million Sell-Off

Just as momentum seemed poised to drive Bitcoin higher in anticipation of a full bullish breakout, a swift and sizable market dump derailed the move. Analysis of order books revealed that approximately $240 million worth of Bitcoin was sold off into the market at the critical $104,000 juncture. While large holders, often dubbed “whales,” are typically suspected in such scenarios, it’s noteworthy that only about $3 million of the sell pressure came from the largest class of whales known as “Brown Mega Whales,” suggesting a broader swath of medium-to-large holders contributed to the event.

This data reinforced suspicions that a confluence of traders took profits or hedged risk at these local highs, highlighting the importance of order flow in shaping short-term price action. In effect, the market’s reaction can be likened to a grand chess match, with each significant sell-off or buy-in echoing outwards and shifting the positions and intentions of thousands of other participants.

Social media platforms and trading forums exploded with speculation and analysis, as market observers debated the implications. Posts referenced the sudden appearance of immense sell walls and discussed whether the renewed short interest would push Bitcoin below the crucial psychological threshold of $100,000. Despite the intensity of the sell-off, no “capitulation” event materialized, as many smaller participants chose to hold rather than panic-sell, citing past recovery patterns following gap fills.

Derivatives Market Trends: Falling Open Interest and Shifting Sentiment

Perhaps the most telling development came from the derivatives side of the market, where open interest—essentially the sum of active trading contracts—plummeted by more than 11% within a single week (as of November 2025). Such a rapid contraction is widely interpreted as traders reducing exposure and deleveraging, stepping away from high-risk trades as uncertainty swells. The market, in essence, was entering a risk-off phase.

From an analytical standpoint, this can be compared to a ship’s crew battening down hatches before a storm: by winding down speculative bets, traders seek stability and protection until the unpredictable winds of volatility begin to calm. Historically, such periods of deleveraging have been correlated with market bottoms or bases, where selling pressure exhausts itself and strong hands begin accumulating once more.

Research notes have highlighted this point, stating the market is “eliminating speculative risk,” which has traditionally paved the way for sustainable price recoveries. More seasoned investors often interpret a falling open interest during price drawdowns as a precursor to a new wave of accumulation—a buying opportunity, rather than a time for fear.

Expert Analysis: Calls for Caution and Opportunity Amid Bitcoin Volatility

Amid frayed nerves, many market analysts and experienced traders maintained a pragmatic outlook. They pointed out that gap fills—especially at significant levels such as $104,000—have a long-standing track record of triggering sharp but ultimately transient volatility. The “game” is not only in identifying these gaps but in timing one’s returns as order books thicken with both buying and selling intent.

Notably, some experts emphasized that the current consolidation, while unnerving for short-term speculators, could be setting the stage for a rebound that ultimately propels Bitcoin beyond its historical highs. The key lies in the interplay between on-chain data, like declining open interest, and real-time trading sentiment, visible in the ebb and flow of social media discussions.

Several widely followed traders highlighted “pivotal price points,” with sub-$100,000 levels forming a potential support zone. These assessments were echoed in Twitter discussions and blog posts, where the phrase “buy the dip” began circulating again among contrarian investors, many of whom cited historical analogies to periods in previous bull cycles that saw similar deleveraging events precede powerful recoveries.

Market Sentiment on Social Media: Debates, Data, and Divergence

As the dust settled following the gap fill and whale-led dump, Twitter and crypto forums continued to buzz with competing theories and emotional reactions. Some called this correction “the most hated bull run ever,” bemoaning what they saw as endless head fakes and frustrating volatility. Others maintained an optimistic view, insisting that such shakeouts are necessary to flush out weak hands and set more durable foundations for future rallies.

One particularly popular post broke down the current price action by referencing historical parallels—reminding followers that every major Bitcoin rally has been littered with sharp corrections, where opportunistic buyers thrive on the fear of those less convicted. Another trending tweet explained, “Another gap closed within the first few trading days of the week. This has become an incredibly reliable and predictable pattern.” This observation, echoed by many, underscores just how much the psychology of pattern recognition drives digital asset markets.

Together, these conversations highlight a central truth: sentiment in crypto markets is as much a psychological battleground as it is a technical one. The struggle between fear and greed, risk-on and risk-off, plays out in real time, often leading to self-reinforcing market phenomena that capture both veteran and novice traders.

The Role of WEEX: Enhancing Brand Alignment Amid Market Turbulence

In the context of heightened volatility and shifting sentiment, traders and investors increasingly look for platforms that offer stability, transparency, and innovative trading tools. WEEX, known for its robust risk management features and user-centric approach, has continued to support investors throughout the current market environment. The platform’s transparent reporting and advanced charting capabilities equip traders with real-time market insight, empowering more informed decision-making even as the broader market landscape shifts unpredictably.

By prioritizing security and seamless trading experiences, WEEX has positioned itself as a trusted partner for users navigating the often turbulent world of cryptocurrency markets. This commitment to credibility and enhanced functionality resonates with a growing base of global crypto enthusiasts seeking a dependable exchange, especially during times of uncertainty and transformation.

Looking Forward: Bitcoin’s Path Ahead After the $104K Gap Fill

With the most recent CME gap now closed and the ensuing volatility still fresh in the market’s collective memory, Bitcoin’s next steps are the subject of intense debate. Will the deleveraging phase and risk-off environment give way to renewed bullish momentum, or is further downside in store as the market seeks new equilibrium?

It’s clear that the dynamics of the futures market, order book activity, and social sentiment will continue to shape short-term price movements. Yet, in the broader context, the willingness of large holders to sell—and the readiness of long-term investors to accumulate during corrections—illustrates the healthy churn at the heart of a maturing financial ecosystem.

Investors and market watchers alike would do well to heed the lessons of past cycles: while price gaps exert a magnetic pull and volatility is a constant companion, these forces also create opportunities for those who approach the market with discipline, patience, and a keen understanding of both data and human psychology.


Frequently Asked Questions

What is a CME gap and why does it matter for Bitcoin price action?

A CME gap refers to the difference in Bitcoin futures prices on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange that arises when the market closes for the weekend and reopens at a different price level. These gaps are considered important because the price of Bitcoin often moves to fill them once trading resumes, creating predictable targets for traders.

How does whale activity affect the Bitcoin market?

Whale activity—large-scale buying or selling by major holders—can significantly influence price direction by creating sudden moves in liquidity. Large sell-offs, like the recent $240 million dump, often trigger rapid declines as the market absorbs the selling pressure and smaller traders react emotionally.

Why did open interest in Bitcoin derivatives drop sharply, and what does it signal?

The sharp drop in open interest means many traders closed their derivative positions, cutting back on leverage and speculative bets. This reduction in market risk usually signals a transition toward greater stability and can precede a period of price recovery as the market resets.

What are the most discussed support levels for Bitcoin after the recent sell-off?

Following the $104,000 CME gap fill and sell-off, traders are closely watching the $100,000 level as key psychological support, with some analysts also mentioning sub-$100,000 areas as potential entry points for long-term investors.

How does WEEX support traders during volatile market periods?

WEEX provides a secure, transparent, and user-friendly trading platform with advanced risk management tools. Its real-time reporting and robust technology help traders make informed decisions, offering reliability and peace of mind during episodes of high market volatility.

You may also like

From 0 to $1 Million: Five Steps to Outperform the Market Through Wallet Tracking

If you can grasp the system and see transactions as a byproduct of building a better life, then your chances of success will be much greater.

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook

Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more